SC to hear pleas against quashing of CRZ clearances to Rs 14,000 crore Mumbai coastal road project : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

SC to hear pleas against quashing of CRZ clearances to Rs 14,000 crore Mumbai coastal road project

NEW DELHI:The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on Friday the appeals challenging the Bombay High Court verdict which had quashed the CRZ clearances granted to Mumbai civic body’s ambitious Rs 14,000-crore coastal road project.

SC to hear pleas against quashing of CRZ clearances to Rs 14,000 crore Mumbai coastal road project

For representation only. Photo: iStock



New Delhi, October 21

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear on Friday the appeals challenging the Bombay High Court verdict which had quashed the CRZ clearances granted to Mumbai civic body’s ambitious Rs 14,000-crore coastal road project.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices SA Bobde and SA Nazeer was told by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that the matter, which was last heard on in July this year, required an urgent hearing.

Mehta, appearing for Mumbai’s civic body, said as the court was busy with the Ayodhya matter, this case could not be taken up on August 20 as assured and it may now be listed for hearing.

“We are still busy...We can transfer this to some other bench,” the court said.

The solicitor general, however, insisted that as this Bench was aware of the facts, so, the appeal may be heard by it only.

“All right, we will see,” the bench said.   

It had said earlier that it would hear on August 20, the appeals in which had sought an interim stay on the High Court’s verdict quashing the CRZ clearances the Mumbai’s coastal road project.

The apex court had sought response from fishermen’s association, activists and residents on whose petitions the High Court on July 16 quashed the CRZ (Coastal Regulation Zone) clearances, saying there was “serious lacuna” in the decision-making process and lack of proper scientific study.

“Notice on interim relief. The matter to be heard on August 20,” had said the Bench.

The Bench was hearing the appeals filed by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Larsen and Toubro Ltd and HCC HDC JV. 

The Municipal Corporation had submitted that CRZ clearance was granted on the undisputed land and the high court’s order be stayed. However, the apex court had said that it will hear the parties concerned first on the pleas.

A Division Bench of the high court in its ruling had said the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) cannot proceed with work on the 29.2 km project, which proposes to connect Marine Drive area in south Mumbai to suburban Borivali in north Mumbai.

The high court had noted that the environmental clearance was required to be taken by the BMC under Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification issued by the Centre.

“We declare that the civic body cannot proceed with the works without obtaining an environmental clearance under EIA notification. Further, permission under the Wildlife (Protection) Act-1972 should also be obtained,” the high court had said.

“It is obvious that a serious lacuna has occurred in the decision-making process. We hold that there is lack of proper scientific study and this has been overlooked by Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA), the EIA and the Union Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF),” it said.

The high court quashed and set aside the approval granted by the MCZMA on January 4, 2017, the nod given by the EAC on March 17, 2017 and the final approval granted by the MoEF on May 11, 2017.

The high court, however, had upheld the December 30, 2015, amendment to the CRZ Rules that permitted reclamation of land in coastal regulated areas for constructing roads.

In April, the high court had prohibited the BMC from carrying out any further work on the project following which the corporation appealed in the Supreme Court.

In May, the apex court permitted the corporation to carry out the existing work, but prohibited it from doing any new work.

The apex court then directed the high court to take up the petitions for final hearing.

The petitioners challenged the reclamation and construction work for the project on the primary ground that it will result in damage to the coastline and destroy major marine life along the coast and livelihood of the fishermen.

They claimed that the coastal road project will irreversibly damage the coastal ecosystem and deprive the fishing community in the city of its source of livelihood.

The BMC earlier told the high court that it had all the necessary approvals for the project.

The project, proposed to connect south Mumbai with north western suburbs of the metropolis, was one of the flagship infrastructure schemes of the BJP-led Maharashtra government. PTI

Top News

Supreme Court to deliver verdict on PILs seeking 100% cross-verification of EVM votes with VVPAT on Friday

Supreme Court to deliver verdict on PILs seeking 100% cross-verification of EVM votes with VVPAT on Friday

A Bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta ...

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

The annual report of the State Department highlights instanc...

Family meets Amritpal Singh in Assam jail after his lawyer claims he'll contest Lok Sabha poll from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib

Couldn't talk due to strictness of jail authorities: Amritpal's family after meeting him in jail

Their visit comes a day after Singh's legal counsel Rajdev S...

Centre grants 'Y' category security cover to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary among 3 Punjab Congress rebels

Centre grants 'Y' category security to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary and 2 other Punjab Congress rebels

The Central Reserve Police Force has been directed by the Mi...


Cities

View All