SC verdict on ''criminal'' netas on Tuesday : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

SC verdict on ''criminal'' netas on Tuesday

NEW DELHI: Should politicians against criminal charges have been framed by a court of law be debarred from contesting polls? A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra is to deliver its verdict on the issue on Tuesday.

SC verdict on ''criminal'' netas on Tuesday

The Bench will deliver its verdict at 10.30 am. Tribune file photo



Satya Prakash

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 24

Should politicians against criminal charges have been framed by a court of law be debarred from contesting polls?

A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra is to deliver its verdict on the issue on Tuesday.

The Bench, which also includes Justice RF Nariman, Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra, will deliver its verdict at 10.30 am on a PIL filed in 2011 by Public Interest Foundation which demanded debarring politicians facing serious criminal charges in order to de-criminalise Indian politics. It had reserved the verdict on the issue on August 28.

Ruling out any judicial legislation to check criminals entering Parliament and state legislatures, the Bench had last month wondered if it can ask the Election Commission not to allot symbols to recognised political parties’ candidates facing serious criminal charges, even as the NDA government vehemently opposed it.

The Bench had said it would consider directing the Election Commission to ask political parties to get their members disclose criminal cases against them to enable voters to know about “alleged crooks” attempting to enter the legislature.

Attorney General KK Venugopal had told the Bench that Article 102 provided for Parliament to make law on the issue and hence the top court should leave it to the wisdom of the parliamentarians. He had reminded the Bench of the concept of separation of powers.

”Everybody understands that. We cannot direct Parliament to make a law. The question is what we can do to stem the rot,” the Bench had commented.

But Venugopal had said what the court can’t do directly; it can’t do indirectly as even the direction to the Election Commission had the same effect of disqualifying someone from contesting.

“Nobody is disqualifying anybody. What we may direct the Election Commission is that the election symbol of a political party be taken away if a person, facing criminal charges, is allowed to contest the election on its ticket,” Justice Nariman clarified.

Taking serious note of people with criminal antecedents becoming members of Parliament and state Assemblies, the Bench had on August 9 said the problem can no longer be ignored by the legislature. “It is the duty of the legislature to respond to the collective cry of the citizens. Today the citizens are saying please don’t let such people contest elections…It can’t be ignored by the legislature It’s a national thinking…,” it had said.

Top News

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

The annual report of the State Department highlights instanc...

Family meets Amritpal Singh in Assam jail after his lawyer claims he'll contest Lok Sabha poll from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib

Couldn't talk due to strictness of jail authorities: Amritpal's family after meeting him in jail

Their visit comes a day after Singh's legal counsel Rajdev S...

Centre grants 'Y' category security cover to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary among 3 Punjab Congress rebels

Centre grants 'Y' category security to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary and 2 other Punjab Congress rebels

The Central Reserve Police Force has been directed by the Mi...

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes: Report

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes

According to ‘The Times’, the Sikh court was launched last w...


Cities

View All