Would have sacked army chief if Kargil war was conducted without informing me: Imran Khan

Slams Nawaz Sharif for targeting military establishment

Would have sacked army chief if Kargil war was conducted without informing me: Imran Khan

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. Reuters file

Islamabad, October 2

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan has said that he would have sacked the Army Chief had the Kargil war with India been started without informing him.

Nawaz Sharif, who was the prime minister during the Kargil war, has long maintained that he was not aware of what was happening when the conflict broke out in 1999. He says the then army chief Gen Pervez Musharraf had attacked Kargil without informing him.

“I would have sacked the army chief if Kargil operation was conducted without informing me,” Khan said in an interview to private news channel Samaa TV on Thursday.

Khan also said that he would sack the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) chief if the latter asked him to resign. The comment was made in the context of three-time prime minister Sharif’s claim that the ISI chief asked him to step down in 2014 when Khan had unleashed a big protest sit-in the national capital.

He said the army was keeping the country united and slammed Sharif for targeting the military establishment.

“Look at Libya, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen; the entire Muslim world is ablaze [so] why are we safe? If it weren’t for our army, our country would’ve been in three pieces…” Khan said.

Sharif recently made two speeches from London, where he has been staying since November 2019 on medical grounds, directly attacking the army for interference in politics and claimed that Khan came to power through its support.

The powerful Army, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its 70 plus years of existence, has hitherto wielded considerable power in the matters of security and foreign policy.

Khan also said that it was not the army’s job to run the government and failure of a democratically elected government should not be used to impose a martial law.

“If a judge gives a wrong decision it means the judiciary has to evolve. The army has evolved as well. Contemporary civil-military relations are the best in history because they are all working in their spheres,” he said.

He also claimed that the army was standing by the government in all matters including relations with India, opening of the Kartarpur Corridor and the coronavirus pandemic. PTI

Don't Miss

Arrival of pets has been the exact disruption we needed

Arrival of pets has been the exact disruption we needed

Modi to Ganguly, how different is BCCI?

Modi to Ganguly, how different is BCCI?

Sins of the father & the aftermath

Sins of the father & the aftermath

Summer of 69, in Himalayas

Summer of 69, in Himalayas

Congress in need of overhaul

Congress in need of overhaul

Top Stories

Govt blocks 43 more mobile apps 'prejudicial' to India's sovereignty

Govt blocks 43 more mobile apps 'prejudicial' to India's sovereignty

The government on June 29 and September 2 had also banned se...

Will go by scientific advice on Covid vaccine, don’t have many answers yet: Modi

Will go by scientific advice on Covid vaccine, don’t have many answers yet: Modi

PM terms trend of Covid resurgence in some states worrisome,...

UP okays ordinance against conversion for marriage

UP okays ordinance against conversion for marriage

Violators face up to 10 years in jail

Russia aims at $20-dollar vaccine in India by January

Russia aims at $20-dollar vaccine in India by January

Two-shot course will cost around Rs 1,400; Sputnik V efficac...

Stop undermining Rajya Sabha leaders: Anand Sharma to Cong detractors

Stop undermining Rajya Sabha leaders: Anand Sharma to Cong detractors

Comes day after party’s upper house leaders were asked to ‘r...

Cities

View All