Opinion: Saving Aravallis beyond height
The Western Ghats' legacy is missing in the SC’s Aravalli order. Ecology, not geometry, must define the hills.
THE Supreme Court's December 29, 2025 order on the Aravalli hills has been welcomed as an act of judicial self-correction. By staying its own November ruling — which had introduced a 100-metre elevation threshold for identifying Aravalli hills — and by directing the formation of a new expert committee, the SC signalled a willingness to revisit concerns raised by scientists, conservationists and affected communities. Yet, even in its caution, the order reveals a conceptual gap: it suspends a contested definition without outlining a clear pathway for developing a more robust one.


