33 years later, families of Nakodar victims seek ATR : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

33 years later, families of Nakodar victims seek ATR

JALANDHAR: With Justice Gurnam Singh Commission report on the death of four Sikh youths in Nakodar in 1986 coming in the public domain and raising questions on the role of police officials, the affected families are seeking an “action taken report (ATR)” on the 33-year old case.

33 years later, families of Nakodar victims seek ATR

Baldev Singh, father of victim Ravinder Singh



Deepkamal Kaur

Tribune News Service

Jalandhar, February 17

With Justice Gurnam Singh Commission report on the death of four Sikh youths in Nakodar in 1986 coming in the public domain and raising questions on the role of police officials, the affected families are seeking an “action taken report (ATR)” on the 33-year old case.

The report was tabled in the Punjab Assembly in 2001. Four youths — Baldhir Singh, Harminder Singh, Jhalman Singh and Ravinder Singh — were allegedly shot dead by the police in Nakodar on February 4, 1986, much like the Behbal Kalan episode.

Ravinder Singh’s father Baldev Singh, 73, of Littran village, recalled: “My son was barely 19. I was then working in a bank. That evening, I saw the body of my son and of three more, all with injuries on the chest. Instead of penalising the officials, they were given plum postings. I want justice. The incident occurred during the Akali regime and the report was tabled during their tenure. I hope the Congress government now will take action.”

The report says the then SP Operations, AK Sharma, did not report to the district magistrate even after he had ordered firing. Both Mohammad Izhar Alam, then Jalandhar SSP, and Darbara Singh Guru, then Jalandhar ADC, were in Nakodar at the time of the incident. It also says the peaceful crowd, after ardas at about 3.30 pm, was marching towards a gurdwara when the police opened fire.

On the police claim that the action was taken after Inspector Jaswant Singh sustained a gunshot injury, the commission points out that the police should have taken the help of forensic experts on the “pellet-like object”, while pointing out that a doctors’ report clearly stated the cop had not sustained any serious injury.

Also, the FIR, registered on February 3, 1986, and cancelled the following day mentioned the crowd was armed with lathis and swords, not guns.

Top News

EC seeks BJP's response on Opposition charge of PM Modi violating model code

Election Commission seeks BJP's response on Opposition charge of PM Modi violating model code

Poll panel also asks Congress to respond to complaints filed...

Massive landslide hit Arunachal-China border area; major portion of highway washed away

Massive landslide hits Arunachal-China border area; major portion of highway washed away

Videos shows huge stretch of the highway missing, making it ...

UAV crashes near Rajasthan’s Jaisalmer; Indian Air Force orders probe

UAV crashes near Rajasthan’s Jaisalmer; Indian Air Force orders probe

No damage to any personnel or property has been reported

Maharashtra cyber cell summons actor Tamannaah Bhatia in illegal IPL streaming case

Maharashtra cyber cell summons actor Tamannaah Bhatia in illegal IPL streaming case

For allegedly promoting the viewing of IPL matches on Fairpl...

JEE-Main 2024 result declared; 56 candidates score 100 percentile

JEE-Main 2024 result declared; 56 candidates score 100 percentile

Out of 56, 15 are from Telangana, 7 each from Andhra Pradesh...


Cities

View All