Duty-bound to act on directions in drug case, Punjab tells HC : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Duty-bound to act on directions in drug case, Punjab tells HC

Duty-bound to act on directions in drug case, Punjab tells HC

Photo for representation. File photo



Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, February 15

Describing as misconceived the allegations of inaction on reports submitted by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) in the Punjab drug case, the government today said the same were handed over to the Punjab and Haryana High Court and not the state.

As the case came up for resumed hearing, the counsel placed before the Bench an affidavit stating, among other things, that the state was duty-bound to act in accordance with “the directions that may be passed by this court in connection with the reports submitted by the SIT”.

The affidavit by Assistant Inspector-General of Police, Litigation, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, Sarabjit Singh, added that the High Court, in November 2017, directed the head of the Special Task Force, Harpreet Singh Sidhu, to investigate the role of Inspector Inderjit Singh and then Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga, Raj Jit Singh Hundal regarding drug trafficking in the state and submit a status report.

An application was then moved by Hundal stating that he was not likely to get a fair and impartial investigation at the hands of Sidhu on account of his alleged personal bias against him.

Without going into the veracity of the allegations, the High Court modified its earlier order to the extent that the allegations of complicity and close association of Hundal with Inderjit Singh emanating out of an FIR pertaining to drug trafficking would be investigated by a three-member special investigation team, comprising DGP Siddharth Chattopadhyaya and IPS officers Prabodh Kumar and Kunwar Vijay Pratap Singh.

“It may be seen that the SIT submitted the reports directly to the court in pursuance of the developments on various dates as reflected in the orders dated February 1, 2018, March 15, 2018, and May 23, 2018, passed by the court. Ever since, the said reports have been lying in sealed covers in the custody of this court,” it was added.

The developments before the Bench of Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia and Justice Harpreet Kaur Jeewan took place a decade after the High Court took suo motu cognizance of the drug menace in Punjab.

The state was represented by Additional Advocate-General Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, while intervener Lawyers for Human Rights International was represented by advocate Navkiran Singh.

He was seeking directions for opening the reports filed by the SIT. The Centre was represented in the matter by its senior counsel Arun Gosain.

About The Author

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.


Top News

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

The annual report of the State Department highlights instanc...

Family meets Amritpal Singh in Assam jail after his lawyer claims he'll contest Lok Sabha poll from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib

Couldn't talk due to strictness of jail authorities: Amritpal's family after meeting him in jail

Their visit comes a day after Singh's legal counsel Rajdev S...

Centre grants 'Y' category security cover to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary among 3 Punjab Congress rebels

Centre grants 'Y' category security to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary and 2 other Punjab Congress rebels

The Central Reserve Police Force has been directed by the Mi...

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes: Report

First Sikh court opens in UK to deal with family disputes

According to ‘The Times’, the Sikh court was launched last w...


Cities

View All