Win Big with Tribune! Holiday Sale now extended till 26 January
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Fit at enrolment, later disability entitles Army officer to pension: HC

Dismisses govt plea against Armed Forces Tribunal order
Photo for representational purpose only. iStock

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Any officer serving in the armed forces who was found fit at the time of enrolment and is later found to be suffering from a disability is entitled to the benefit of disability pension by rounding it off.

Advertisement

This has been ruled by the Punjab and Haryana High Court while dismissing a writ petition filed by the Government of India against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Chandigarh, dated September 15, 2023. The tribunal had directed grant of disability pension benefits in favour of ex-serviceman Kashmir Singh by rounding off the disability element of the pension to 50 per cent for two years, from May 1, 2001, to April 30, 2003, though the disability had been assessed at less than 20 per cent i.e. 6-10 per cent.

Advertisement

Counsel for the government submitted that Kashmir Singh joined the Army service on September 14, 1983, and was discharged from service on April 30, 2001, in low medical category due to the disability ‘duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis’ and the disability was assessed less than 20 per cent i.e. @ 6-10 per cent by the medical board. The same was held to be neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service. Therefore, as the disability was not assessed at 20 per cent or more — a condition precedent for the grant of disability pension — the tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in granting relief to the respondent. Hence, the order is unsustainable.

After hearing the arguments, Justice Harsimran Singh Sethi and Justice Rohit Kapoor upheld the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal. The Bench said in the present case it was undisputed that no note of any disease had been recorded at the time of the appellant’s acceptance for military service.

Hence, in the absence of any perversity in the impugned order dated September 15, 2023, either on the basis of facts or settled principles of law, no ground was made out for interference by the court in the facts and circumstances of the case, and the writ petition was accordingly dismissed.

Advertisement

The Bench further noted that, as per the judgment in ‘Dharamvir Singh’s’ case, where an Army personnel is found fit at the time of enrolment and is later found to have contracted a disease, the same is presumed to have been aggravated by and attributable to military service.

Advertisement
Tags :
#ArmedForces#DisabilityPensionRounding#DuodenalUlcer#ExServicemenBenefits#KashmirSinghCase#MilitaryServiceArmedForcesTribunalDisabilityPensionMilitaryDisabilitypunjabharyanahighcourt
Show comments
Advertisement