Taunting handicap ‘most inhumane kind of cruelty’: Punjab and Haryana High Court : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Taunting handicap ‘most inhumane kind of cruelty’: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Holds ADJ’s findings in a divorce case erroneous

Taunting handicap ‘most inhumane kind of cruelty’: Punjab and Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that taunting a person for being handicapped, pushing him around and throwing him on the ground when he is helpless and unable to defend himself constitutes as “the most inhumane kind of cruelty that can be meted out to the disabled”. - File photo



Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, September 18

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that taunting a person for being handicapped, pushing him around and throwing him on the ground when he is helpless and unable to defend himself constitutes as “the most inhumane kind of cruelty that can be meted out to the disabled”.

The assertion by the Bench of Justice Ritu Bahri and Justice Nidhi Gupta came on an appeal filed by the appellant-husband against an order, dated April 21, 2010, passed by the Hoshiarpur Additional District Judge (ADJ), whereby his petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for the grant of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion by the respondent-wife was dismissed.

Justice Gupta assrted that such actions of the respondent-wife amounted to inflicting both physical and mental cruelty on the appellant-husband. “Accordingly, the findings of the Hoshiarpur ADJ in this regard are held to be erroneous and contrary to the evidence on record and are, as such, reversed,” Justice Gupta added.

Justice Gupta added that the impugned order was strangely silent regarding the testimonies. No mention whatsoever was made in the impugned order regarding the statements of these witnesses, which were vital to the case. The appellant’s averments in this regard have been rejected only on the ground that he had not given the specific date and time and place when the respondent had pushed or taunted him.

“In our considered view, this is not tenable. There is sufficient evidence on record in the form of testimonies where it is established that the respondent ill-treated the appellant for his handicap,” the Bench concluded.

About The Author

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.

#Hoshiarpur


Top News

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

Deeply biased: MEA on US report citing human rights violations in India

The annual report of the State Department highlights instanc...

Family meets Amritpal Singh in Assam jail after his lawyer claims he'll contest Lok Sabha poll from Punjab’s Khadoor Sahib

Couldn't talk due to strictness of jail authorities: Amritpal's family after meeting him in jail

Their visit comes a day after Singh's legal counsel Rajdev S...

Centre grants 'Y' category security cover to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary among 3 Punjab Congress rebels

Centre grants 'Y' category security to Phillaur MLA Vikramjit Chaudhary and 2 other Punjab Congress rebels

The Central Reserve Police Force has been directed by the Mi...

NIA arrests UK resident Inderpal Gaba in connection with attack on Indian High Commission in London

NIA arrests UK resident Inderpal Gaba for attack on Indian High Commission in London

Inderpal Singh Gaba, a resident of Hounslow in the UK, has b...


Cities

View All