AS an impression appears to exist in some quarters that our Delhi correspondent, whose communication on the subject of the position of the moderate party with regard to the Rowlatt Bills appeared in a recent issue of the Tribune, is an “extremist,” and that he wrote the letter with the object of discrediting the moderate leaders, we think it only fair to state that far from being an “extremist,” our correspondent is a prominent moderate, one whom the moderate leaders themselves have more than once considered worthy of being associated with them in important national undertakings. We have made it clear that we do not share the views of our correspondent, and Dr Tej Bahadur Sapru’s letter, already published in these columns, shows that on one most important point the correspondent was misinformed. But that is no reason why he should be represented as what he is not.