DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
Gen Z Speak Up !
Grand Independence Day Sale Know More
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Judge bars immigration arrests at US courthouses in setback for Trump

The Trump administration's reversal of long-standing policy against arrests at immigration court resulted ‘not from merely unreasoned decision-making but a complete lack of decision-making’, writes US District Judge Casey Pitts of San Francisco

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
U.S. President Donald Trump gestures as he delivers remarks during a visit to a Mack Trucks' assembly plant, in Macungie, Pennsylvania, U.S., June 23, 2026. REUTERS
Advertisement

A judge barred the federal government from making arrests at immigration courts, ordering an end to a practice that took hold shortly after President Donald Trump took office last year.

Advertisement

The Trump administration's reversal of long-standing policy against arrests at immigration court resulted "not from merely unreasoned decision-making but a complete lack of decision-making", wrote US District Judge Casey Pitts of San Francisco on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Authorities failed to address the "chilling effect" of arrests on whether people attend court hearings.

Advertisement

"For 80 years, Congress has commanded federal agencies to think before they act," wrote Pitts, referring to the Administrative Procedure Act, a 1946 law that requires federal agencies to justify its actions.

That law, he wrote, "does not require an agency to make the choice that a reviewing court might deem preferable. But it demands that an agency at least provide sound reasons for following its chosen course".

Advertisement

The ruling is the second setback for courthouse arrests since May when a federal judge in New York barred them at immigration courts. That order applied only in New York, while the latest decision invalidated the policy nationwide.

James Percival, the US Homeland Security Department's general counsel, criticised the ruling as an exercise in judicial overreach.

"When a judge sentences a defendant, the defendant is taken into custody. If an alien is ordered removed by an immigration judge, the same should happen. A district judge ordering otherwise is naked judicial activism in service of an anti-American, open borders agenda," Percival wrote online.

After Trump took office, hearings across the country often ended with cases being dismissed by the government, setting the stage for plainclothes agents to make arrests in hallways in coordination with attorneys from the Department of Homeland Security.

Pitts, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, faulted the administration for carrying out the arrests and for holding people in nearby cells for longer than a prescribed 12-hour limit.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts