DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Careers Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Australia’s Parliament debates new anti-hate speech, gun laws after Sydney attack

Parliament was earlier scheduled to resume from February 2026, However, legislation expected to be passed by parliament on January 21,

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Attorney-General Michelle Rowland during a vote on an amendment of the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism (Criminal and Migration Laws) Bill 2026 during a federal parliament sitting following the Bondi terror attack at Parliament House in Canberra, Australia, January 20, Reuters photo.
Advertisement

Australia’s Parliament on Tuesday began debating draft anti-hate speech and gun laws proposed after two shooters killed 15 people at a Jewish festival in Sydney last month.

Advertisement

The draft laws would create new restrictions on gun ownership and create a government-funded buyback scheme to compensate people forced to hand in their firearms.

Advertisement

Anti-hate speech laws would enable hate groups that don’t fit Australia’s definition of a terrorist organisation, such as Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, to be outlawed. Hizb ut-Tahrir is already outlawed by some countries.

Advertisement

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke told Parliament that alleged gunmen Sajid Akram, 50, and his 24-year-old son Naveed Akram would not have been allowed to possess guns under the proposed laws.

The father, who was shot dead by police during the attack on Jewish worshippers during Hanukkah celebrations at Bondi Beach on Dec 14, legally owned the guns used.

Advertisement

His son, who was wounded, has been charged with dozens of offenses including 15 counts of murder and one of committing a terrorist act over the attack, which was allegedly inspired by the Islamic State group.

Burke said the Indian-born father would have been barred from gun ownership under the proposed laws because he was not an Australian citizen.

The Australian-born son would also have been banned because he had come under surveillance from spy agency Australian Security Intelligence Organisation in 2019 over his association with suspected extremists.

“In responding to the antisemitic terror attack, we need to deal with the motivation and we need to deal with the method,” Burke told Parliament.

“We are dealing with two people there who had horrific antisemitic bigotry in their minds and in their hearts. And they had weapons they should not have had,” Burke added.

ASIO would also have a role under the proposed anti-hate speech laws in deciding which hate groups should be outlawed. Neo-Nazi Group National Socialist Network has announced plans to disband rather than have its members targeted under the laws.

The legislation is expected to be passed by Parliament by Wednesday.

Parliament had been scheduled to resume for the year in February, but was brought back early to respond to Australia’s worst mass shooting since 1996.

A lone shooter killed 35 people in Tasmania state that year, in a massacre that galvanised the nation into introducing tough gun laws that drastically reduced the number of rapid-fire weapons in public ownership. The government then bought back almost 700,000 guns.

But the states of Tasmania and Queensland and the Northern Territory are resisting the federal push for a new gun buyback, for which the states would be expected to pay half the cost.

Burke said his government would continue to negotiate with the states and territories on the buyback.

Read what others can’t with The Tribune Premium

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts