Wednesday, September 18, 2019
facebook
World

Posted at: Sep 12, 2019, 12:46 PM; last updated: Sep 12, 2019, 12:46 PM (IST)

Japan man sues firm for ‘paternity leave harassment’

Japan man sues firm for ‘paternity leave harassment’
Fathers face harsh criticism for taking leave, despite being legally entitled to do so as the government tries desperately to boost the birth rate, the man’s lawyer Naoto Sasayama told AFP. Thinkstock

Tokyo, September 12

A Japanese man who says he was penalised for taking paternity leave brought his case to a Tokyo court on Thursday, a rare suit in a country struggling with one of the world’s lowest birth rates.

The 38-year-old, who has remained anonymous, is suing his employer, sportswear maker Asics for 4.4 million yen ($41,000) in damages.

He claims that after he took paternity leave, he was transferred to jobs that bore no relation to his skills or experience.

By law, Japan offers comparatively generous parental leave—both parents can take up to a year off, with additional renewable six-month periods if a nursery place is unavailable.

But while more than 80 per cent of women take parental leave, only 6 per cent of fathers do. The disparity, activists say, is partly due to pressure from employers and a society that prizes long work hours.

The plaintiff took a year’s leave in 2015-2016 when his first child was born, and another year in 2018-2019 after the birth of his second child.

He has accused Asics of effectively punishing him for his decision and doing so as a warning to other employees who might want to take time off.

Of the small number of men in Japan who take paternity leave, more than 70 per cent are away for less than a fortnight.

Fathers face harsh criticism for taking leave, despite being legally entitled to do so as the government tries desperately to boost the birth rate, the man’s lawyer Naoto Sasayama told AFP.

“The culture established in a post-war Japan expects men to be the sole breadwinner. Stay-at-home men are considered extremely strange,” he said.

“That idea is no longer accepted but some people still can’t understand it,” he said.

Parental leave is not paid for by employers, but government subsidies are available.

The plaintiff says he experienced what is known in Japan as “pata-hara”, short for paternity harassment.

After returning from his first paternity leave, he was transferred from previous roles in marketing and HR to a job in a warehouse at a logistics subsidiary.

He was later able to return to head office, but says he was given “idle work” in what he believes was “silent pressure” on him to quit.

Asics said it had held “sincere” discussions with the man, his lawyer, and labour union officials.

“It is regrettable that we did not reach a final solution. We hope to clarify what actually happened in the course of the trial,” it said in a statement.

Japan’s birth rate was 1.42 in 2018 — one of the world’s lowest, and far below the 2.07 the country needs to maintain its population.

There are diverse causes for the problem, some of which the government has sought to address by increasing nursery spaces and encouraging women to return to work after having children.

There are small signs social norms may be changing, with thousands recently signing an online petition urging a major electronics chain to install changing tables in the men’s bathrooms at its flagship outlets.

And rising political star Shinjiro Koizumi, named environment minister in a cabinet reshuffle on Wednesday, said before his appointment that he would consider taking paternity leave when his wife gives birth next year.

Another high-profile “pata-hara” suit, filed by a Canadian man against Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley, is also currently working its way through the courts. — AFP

COMMENTS

All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On