|   Why placate the USA? IT seems today we the people of
        India, by and large, have abandoned our sense of
        self-respect. This may sound something harsh and
        unpalatable, but, then, truth is often bitter. How else
        do we explain or justify our very meek and unmanly
        response to the intolerable insults that the USA is so
        audaciously hurling on us, one after the other. We are
        almost craving and cringing before the stubborn and
        dictatorial postures being adopted by Mr Clinton and his
        coterie. What India has done in
        carrying out the Pokhran II tests was wholly in
        consonance with its security needs. And, strangely,
        instead of feeling strong and proud, the government and
        most of its leaders are appearing unnerved by the
        American pressures. It is a pity that petty internal
        squabbles and small-minded political considerations have
        in a way cost the country dear. The central
        governments weak-kneed policy and its readiness to
        send its emissaries here and there at the dictates of
        America are, to say the least, something
        incomprehensible. What crime India has committed that we
        are feeling the need to placate the USA and its stooges. After the successive
        nuclear tests the nation should have exhibited the nerves
        of steel and the veins of iron. Instead, we are behaving
        as if we stand on the feet of clay. Let us take a leaf
        out of the example of China and Iran. These countries did
        not succumb to American dictates. America had to
        compromise with these countries. Are we worse off than
        even Iran? Are we the same Indians
        who in 1921 under very adverse circumstances made a great
        success of the Non-Cooperation Movement under
        Gandhijis leadership? With huge bonfires of British
        mercantile and other goods, the very foundations of the
        then mightiest empire was shaken. And today we are so
        shamefacedly patronising American goods on vast scales.
        Perhaps we are drowning ourselves in the sea of American
        commercial operations. We have become crazy and are mad
        and galloping at everything that is American. The 1921 Non-Cooperation
        Movement did the country proud. If the shaky and feeble
        legs of the government cannot bear the onslaughts of the
        hot-headed US President and his cronies, let the common
        people of India gather courage and make history repeat
        itself. Let us boycott everything this is American, and
        surely, sooner than later, sense will dawn on them and
        they will start behaving. We dared the British in the
        20th century. Let us dare the Americans in the 21st
        century, which is so close by. D. P. VERMAPanchkula
 * *
        * * Mr
        versus judge Mr Anupam Gupta through
        his article published on Monday November 16 posed a very
        pertinent question (Mr versus
        judge: who is to judge?) and answered it too. He said that No
        judge, no jurist could draw a better distinction than
        that. I fully agree with him and would also like to
        submit my point of view that a Governor has immunity from
        all law suits. Because of his position as Governor, he is
        the Chancellor of a university, but in this later
        position he is not immune to any law suit. Stretching the point
        further, I submit that a minister is a law-maker sitting
        in the legislative assembly whereas he is a
        policy-executor/servant in the secretariat. These two positions of one
        person are like two sides of the same coin. Therefore,
        the judges position too is the same. A judge is a
        judge when he is engaged in the discharge of his
        duties in his court room or in his chamber, and he
        becomes Mr while speaking conducting his
        affairs at a public meeting at a public place. OM PARKASH WADHWAGohana
 * *
        * * Plight
        of Iraqi children Apropos of the news
        analysis Secrets of Saddam Husseins
        sorrows (Nov 18) by Mr T.K. Ramasamy, it is an
        unhealthy trend that the (united) nations of the world
        are turning a blind eye to the pitiable plight of the
        ordinary people of Iraq. Countless children are
        dying of hunger because of the unavailability of basic
        food items. The sick and the diseased fail to get the
        desirable treatment as there is an acute shortage of
        essential medicines, primarily because of the arrogant
        attitude of the USA, wanting to continue with the
        morale-breaking sanctions. Undeniably, the USA has
        shamelessly managed to hijack the United Nations. And the
        rest of the world seems afraid to stand up and speak
        against the bully. At the slightest pretext, the USA
        bares its fangs to intimidate not just Iraq but anyone
        who dares to differ with it in its pursuit for oil, more
        oil, nothing but all the oil in the world. God help those
        who come in its way. If even now no nation
        dares to stand up and speak for the human rights being
        denied to the Iraqis, then the day is not very far when
        some other nation might have to bear the brunt of the big
        bullys dictatorial attitude. How can the rest of the
        world be mute spectators and allow this situation to
        continue? Perhaps, Pastor Niemoeller warns succinctly: First they came for the
        Jews and I did not speak out
         because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the
        communists and I did not speak out
         because I was not a
        communist. Then they came for the
        trade unionists and I did not speak out
         because I was not a trade
        unionist. Then they came for me
         and there was no one left to speak out for me. VIVEK KHANNAPanchkula
 * *
        * * A
        clogged system Mr Joginder Singh deserves
        appreciation for his article, Indias
        ineffective rulers (The Tribune, Nov 17), in which
        he highlighted the clogging in the Indian system at
        various levels. Looking for a godfather or
        connections has become a must in todays scenario.
        The common man, who has neither of these, is running from
        pillar to post without gaining anything. Persons occupying high
        offices have little regard for the havenots. Government
        employees are enjoying a perpetual holiday. Corruption
        has become the order of the day. The system is plagued
        with all sorts of ills. Character and discipline are
        nowhere to be seen. Political bosses, under their own
        compulsions, have turned their faces to the other side. Will there be any change?
        Hoping... against hope. BIMAL GUPTAUna
 * *
        * * |