![]() |
N E W S I N ..D E T A I L |
![]() Saturday, January 2, 1999 |
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
PATIALA, Jan 1 Attempts to "distort" history by the Sangh Parivar with the support of the Central Government was hotly debated at the just-concluded 59th session of the Indian History Congress held at Punjabi University here. While the tempo was set by Congress president Prof Partha Sarathi Gupta when he referred to Vidya Bharti schools in the country teaching "unscientific hypothesis", the issue was also referred to by Prof Satish Chandra during a special lecture and also came up at the annual business meeting of the Congress. Finally, the Congress passed a resolution criticising the manner in which a "one-sided view" of history was being projected besides changes in textbooks being affected by the BJP-led state governments. Prof Irfan Habib, who was instrumental in getting this resolution passed, in an interview with TNS alleged the Sangh Parivar and its historians were "creating facts" without evidence. For instance, they were trying to seek an Aryan home in India and denying a Dravidian linguistic family by claiming the Rig Veda was written earlier than 5,000 B.C. Similarly, the Sangh Parivar was claiming the Indus valley civilisation was Vedic despite linguistic and archaeological evidence to the contrary. Prof Habib said with regard to medieval India, the Sangh Parivar harped on only the persecution of Hindus ignoring cultural contribution and growth of composite traditions involving Hindus and Muslims. He also criticised the "parivar" for its narrow view of the national movement. He said though it itself did not contribute to the movement, it tried to denigrate leaders like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru. "Such distortions have been taken to the extreme in Pakistan and we know the results," he explained. Eminent historian Prof Bipin Chandra said though history was continuously being reinterpreted, the BJP was going back to "communal" writers. He said the religious life of the people could nowhere be expected to be the most important aspect of life. Nowadays, people were more interested in economic and scientific developments and social and cultural changes. Prof J.S. Grewal stressed that the basic principles of historical writing followed all over the world should be observed in India too. He said any statement on the past should be made on the basis of evidence which could be examined in the present. Besides, all interpretations must be in rational and logical terms and any statement made on the basis of emperical evidence must be revised in the light of more emperical evidence. Prof Grewal said writers who wrote about the past without following these principles laboured under the misconception that they were writing history, while in fact they were only writing political polemic. Dr B.R. Grover, former Director of the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR), while saying distortions had occurred in Indian history, said the BJP had nothing to do with the same. On the contrary, case studies revealed that the distortions had been made by leftist historians. He gave the example of leftists ignoring the destruction of Hindu temples in the medieval period, despite documented evidence. Similarily, NCERT books carried "distorted" lessons and there was a need to correct these. Dr S.K. Gupta from Himachal University, Shimla, said the real problem lay in historians writing history in imperial, Christian, Communist, Islamist or socialist frameworks and moulds. He said such historians always practised double standards in their evaluation of reality. It is because of this that the golden age of Indian history during the ancient times was being belittled, he added. Mr V.N. Datta, Professor Emeritus, Kurukshetra University, however, said to his mind there was no finality in history and it was subject to modification in the light of new evidence. Prof Datta said the view of Marxists and those who practised "Hindutva" believed that history had a definite framework. Any attempt by Communists or the BJP to serve the cause of a particular party of government was bound to distort history, he contended. Dr S.K. Gupta, Head,
Department of History, Punjabi University, called for
doing away with pre-conceived notions and said "we
should not stray away from truth due to religious or
other considerations". |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | Chandigarh | | Editorial | Business | Sports | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |