New calendar
for the new millennium!
By Mohinder
Singh
HOW about a new calendar for the
new millennium? Something simple and sensible! And what
could be a more befitting occasion for it than the start
of the third millennium . More so when a huge effort is
being mounted to refigure computers to the millennium
change.
The current Gregorian
calendar is a monument to historical prejudices. And it
is an astronomically meaningless hodge-podge of pagan
superstitions and misconceptions. The calendar is hard to
learn when you are a child and awkward to use the rest of
your life. Often you have to consult a calendar to link a
date with the day of the week.
Willy-nilly the whole
world has been persuaded to go along with the Gregorian
calendar because of the western hegemony. Surely various
other calendars continue to operate over the globe, such
as the Indian, Chinese, Islamic and Jewish. Yet its
the Gregorian one that primarily regulates our life, more
so of business, work, and travel.
Umpteen proposals have
been put forth from time to time to reform this calendar.
The one advocated by many pragmatic people would have a
calendar year of 13 months, each 28 days long, for a
total of 364 days. And one "fill-in" day to
make the 365 required for a solar year, coupled with an
additional day every four years.
Every month, consisting
of exactly four weeks, could start on Sunday. This will
establish fixed dates for each day of the week. For
example, every Monday would invariably fall on the
second, ninth, sixteenth, and twentythird of every month.
Allied is the proposal
to start new year from December 22, the date from which
days begin to lengthen in the Northern Hemisphere. And
December 22, termed New Years Day, would be the
extra 365th. It will belong to no month and will have no
day-of-the-week designation. A new year will actually
start from December 23, the first Sunday of the first
month.
And while days of the
week can keep their existing nomenclature for convenience
sake, there is a good case for renaming the existing 12
months, plus coining a name for the thirteenth month.
Possibly the exercise could best be undertaken by the
United Nations. The new month/names may well give
representation to major world cultures and civilisations.
Currently, some months are named after Roman Emperors,
while others are factually incorrect. Originally,
September, October, November and December were the
seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth months as their names
denote. Now they are ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth
in our calendar.
Of course, any such
proposal will provoke objections. Firstly, people loathe
to change something to which they have grown
acclimatised. We experienced resistance to the change
over from English system of measurements to the metric
one, though the latter is vastly superior in its
simplicity and ease of use. Now metric system is gaining
universal acceptance.
Employers will object to
a 13-month year; theyll have to pay 13 monthly
salaries instead of 12. Some will object for sentimental
reasons to any change in birthdays; theyre so
accustomed to celebrate on particular dates. Even the
dates of national days will undergo change; it wont
be January 26 for the Republic Day.
The point is that
radical calendar changes have been made in the past. A
year after, nobody cares; a generation later, nobody
remembers.
Take one instance. After
1,627 years of Julian astronomy the earth was 10 days
ahead of the calendar. Pope Gregory XIII summarily solved
the problem by decreeing that October 5,1582, would
become October 15,1582. At another time, people went to
bed on September 2,1752, and woke up on September 14,
1752.
It all hinges on the
question whether the motivation to have a simpler, more
rational calendar is strong enough to overcome the
immense inertia involved in a radical calendar change.
The answer may well be a disappointing no. That way the
world would soldier on with an overly complicated
calendar into the Third Millennium.
The next millennium
could be tough;we can use all the help we can get, such
as an easier calendar.
|