The Tribune - Spectrum
ART & LITERATURE
'ART AND SOUL
BOOKS
MUSINGS
TIME OFF
YOUR OPTION
ENTERTAINMENT
BOLLYWOOD BHELPURI
TELEVISION
WIDE ANGLE
FITNESS
GARDEN LIFE
NATURE
SUGAR 'N' SPICE
CONSUMER ALERT
TRAVEL
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
CAPTION CONTEST
FEEDBACK

Sunday, October 20, 2002

Bridge

How would you have played the contract?

THERE was little point in South mentioning his club suit. Even if North had a good club fit, the hand was likely to play at least as well in the spade game, one level lower. West led a diamond to the queen and East persisted with the suit. How would you have played the contract? Declarer ruffed the second diamond and drew trumps in three rounds. All now depended on his handling of the club suit. Do you know the best play with this combination? Declarer led the 10 of clubs, planning to run the card. If the finesse had lost, he would have played the king next. This line is successful against all 3-2 breaks and loses to just two of the the 4-1 and 1-4 breaks (when East has a singleton queen or jack of clubs). No other line is better. At the table West declined to cover the club 10. Declarer ran the card, gave up a trick in clubs, and soon had ten tricks before him. Suppose, on some different deal, that East had opened 3D. It would not be very unlikely that he had QJxx in clubs alongside the diamonds. You would be more inclined to cash the ace of clubs on the first round, guarding against single queen or jack with East.

— David Bird

Home Top