| 
 | 
                    
                      
                        |  Sunday,
                          October 27, 2002
 |  | Books |  
                        |  |  
                        |  |  You can hate but not ignore KantR. K. Gupta
 The Living
            Thoughts of Kantby Julian Benda. Rupa, Delhi. Pages 228. Rs 150.
 THE
            present work is part of a series aimed at presenting living thoughts
            of various leading thinkers of the world. Julian Benda (1867-1956),
            the author of this work, was a French novelist and philosopher. His
            other works include The Yoke of Pity, The Youth of an
            Intellectual and A Regulator in His Century. The author maintains
            that almost the whole of Kant’s work is still living, either in
            the sense that it has become part and parcel of our philosophical
            thinking, or in the sense of there being staunch opposition to it.
            "The basic theses of the Critique of Pure Reason and the
            Critique of Judgement are still eminently living in the sense
            that, explicitly or not, they are a vital element in all modern
            philosophic writing which relates either to the study of cognition
            or to speculation in aesthetics or biology." (p. 44) On the
            other hand, Kant’s ethical theses, "which fifty years ago
            seemed definitely accepted by mankind, and for that very reason
            deprived of vital quality inasmuch as life implies activity, are the
            object of an opposition which is more organised and resolute than
            ever before and that from this point of view they have acquired a
            tremendous renewal of vitality." (p. 45) One should have no
            difficulty in agreeing with the author that much of what Kant said
            is still alive. This can be easily seen from the fact that, after
            him, hardly has anyone been able to do his philosophical work
            without taking into consideration what he has had to say. But,
            unlike the author’s contention, much of what he said has had both
            strong supporters and strong opponents.
 |