|  | Writes Mehrotra: "Home is often counterpoised against ‘the
                world’`85and associated with shelter, refuge, safety."
                But can we take this for granted; accept home as being
                unproblematic? Home is as much about survival and struggle, as
                the world outside. "If people stopped performing ‘house’-work,
                the world may well grind to a halt. Infants would hardly survive
                without care, nor would many older children. But the
                arrangements and structures within which such care takes place
                are far from ideal. Homes are often oppressive, violent places,
                perpetuating intrinsic hierarchies." And very often, it is
                from homes such as these that single mothers emerge...to create
                new spaces and new homes.
 Single motherhood
                is a growing phenomenon in middle and upper-class India, and
                consequently more visible to the English-speaking urban eye. The
                phenomenon, driven primarily by the education of women and
                economic liberalisation, has led to a growth in the divorce
                rate. Middle-class women have become more assertive and
                independent and aware of their rights. There is also an increase
                in the number of single women who choose not to marry but may
                adopt a child to raise it alone. It is in this context of ‘choice’
                — wanting to or consciously taking on the responsibility of
                being a single parent — that the writing and recording of a
                book like Mehrotra’s makes most sense. In ambitiously
                trying to also integrate stories of ‘circumstance’
                (widowhood, abandonment, etc.) Mehrotra begins to stretch her
                canvas. However, despite her going over the top to include all
                manner and sections of society (working class women from slums
                and rural areas; women who are unmarried, divorced, and widowed;
                women who are Sikh, Christian, Hindu, or Muslim; Indian women
                who live abroad and NRIs who have returned to India), the
                framework still holds. It does so because the stories are told
                simply, in first person, and are engaging. For instance, listen
                to Sabina’s voice: "When I walked out of my marriage, my
                son wasn’t the dominant consideration. But later he ended up
                being the major consideration for all my moves. From being just
                a little child, Dilip has become imperative to all my choices.
                Living the way I do has 80 per cent to do with him." But it is in the
                last section of the book, Reflections and Insights, that
                a reader may be tempted to throw in the towel. Mehrotra’s
                scholarly voice, attempting to touch on every aspect of the
                stories from survival to sexuality makes for ponderous reading.
                For instance, in attempting to communicate that single moms need
                not feel restricted about their sexuality once outside the
                framework of family and marriage, Mehrotra writes: "The
                right to an ethics in sexuality, demanding accountability,
                equity and dignity in the most intimate of human relationships
                requires ‘a multiplication of spaces where sensuality can be
                made manifest, active and dialogic.’ By opening up alternative
                spaces, sexuality is rescued from the exclusivity of family and
                marriage." Mehrotra has
                attempted this book in the nature of research because, as she
                herself says, the lives of single mothers have "so far been
                hidden from sociology, psychology, and political science."
                However, her academic voice does not exactly make for layman
                reading. Mehrotra is not alone. Many academicians, when writing
                a book, lose track of where a book meant for the common reader
                ends and a PhD thesis begins. That is what editors are there
                for. Mehrotra’s attempt is praiseworthy and Penguin’s is
                not.
                 |