| UTI investors taken for a
        ride   THE editorial UTI forfeits its
        trust (Oct 7) represents the sentiments of many an
        investor who depended on the capacity of the Unit Trust
        of India to help him multiply his money rather than try
        his luck in the stock market. But the investors were
        taken for a ride by the trust. A few years ago some shady
        deal had taken place between the UTI and the Reliance
        group when Reliance had sold its right offer to the UTI
        at a price much higher than the market rate, resulting in
        a considerable erosion of the net asset value of the
        UTIs various schemes, and making a dent in the
        hard-earned income of investors. Barring one or two
        schemes, the UTI has not given fixed deposit interest to
        its investors. It is time the working of
        the UTI was closely watched by the Finance Ministry and
        SEBI, as the trust has acquired enough wealth to shake
        the stock markets as also the Indian economy as and when
        wanted by it. JAGVIR GOYALBathinda
 * *
        * * Best
        paper on the web The Tribune is the best
        paper on the web that is easily accessed here in
        Washington DC. As a Chandigarhian I am proud to be able
        to read my paper every morning. Keep up the good work,
        please. TRILOCHAN BHAMRAHWashington DC
 CHB
        and builders I was dismayed by the
        news-item Builders want CHB chief shifted in
        The Tribune of October 10. First, to put the facts
        straight, the Chandigarh Housing Board cannot build any
        housing complex without being allotted land for it by the
        Chandigarh Administration. During the past two years only
        seven acres of land, for which the Governor announced an
        EWS/LIG housing scheme on August 15, 1997 had been
        allocated to the board. As such, to allege that the
        Chairperson has not taken up additional schemes is
        incorrect. A major reason for the
        delay in putting the EWS/LIG scheme to tender was that
        although land was assigned on 30.7.97, the rate to be
        charged for it was communicated by Chandigarh
        Administration 13 months later, on 30.9.98. As a
        consequence, the cost of the dwellings could not be
        finalised. Within 10 days of receiving the land price
        communication, not only has the scheme been got approved
        by the board but also tenders are being called. However, the period of
        delay has not been wasted. Much effort has been put into
        exploring a variety of design options for EWS and LIG
        houses so as to reduce dwelling unit costs without
        compromising on the quality of life for poorer sections
        of society. More importantly, and this
        may be the real reason why the builders association is
        unhappy with Ms Ghosh, she has left no stone unturned to
        streamline the internal functioning of the board to
        increase its transparency and accountability. Ordinary
        residents will be shocked to learn that till Ms Ghosh put
        her foot down, the engineering wing of the board had been
        withdrawing money for all earlier schemes without
        submitting rough cost estimates as per CPWD requirements.
        No previous chairperson demanded rough cost estimates,
        because of which the final cost of construction could not
        be monitored properly.  For the first time, a
        utilisation certificate is being demanded from the
        engineering wing which may have affected an unhindered
        flow of funds to the builders. Since1982 no
        administrative approval for any scheme had been obtained
        despite its being a statutory requirement. Public
        grievances received scant attention with little
        accountability of the board. Another scandalous
        practice in the CHB was that although it was building
        houses for different income groups, there was no
        procedure requiring that only the lower income groups
        were eligible for the cheaper units. As a consequence,
        any Tom, Dick and Harry could obtain the cheaper units
        for speculative purposes. This has also been brought to
        an end now. Rather than demand Ms
        Ghoshs removal, the builders association should
        applaud her efforts to make the CHB an effective,
        transparent and accountable public agency. After all, the
        CHB has not been created only for keeping the builders
        happy. MADHU SARIN, Member, CHB
 Chandigarh
 * *
        * * Crippling
        price rise I must thank you for the
        timely editorial Dear onions (Oct 9),
        highlighting the unspeakable agony of the disadvantaged
        sections of the people reeling under the sky-rocketing
        prices of vegetables. Indeed, how nice on your part to
        spare a thought for the harried poor, and take up the
        cudgels on their behalf! Agreed, a part of the
        blame for the gloomy development may be laid at the door
        of Nature which, acting malignantly, helped damage the
        vital crop. However, the powers that be cannot escape
        responsibility for the obtaining mess as they seem to
        have acted in the matter painfully lackadaisically. It is indeed shameful that
        the aggrieved people have to knock at the door of the
        higher judiciary to seek relief even in those matters
        which fall entirely within the domain of the executive
        authority. The worst part of the
        story is that the political parties  irrespective
        of their hue  have developed a reputation for
        ignoring the interests of the common man. How sad! TARA CHANDAmbota (Una)
 * *
        * * True
        social life The middle In
        defence of bachelors (Oct 8) prompt me to ask:
        why does no one write in defence of
        bachelor-girls? Recipe for happiness in
        social life: liberty, said Burke, must
        be limited in order to be possessed. Social life,
        too, must be limited in order to be enjoyed. No man can
        be happy who is perpetually dependent on others for his
        happiness. A man who has not got sources of happiness
        within himself, and cannot feel happy in solitude even
        for long stretches of time, will neither be happy nor
        make others happy. True social life can be
        had only with those whose character we respect, whose
        tastes and in some measure temperament we share or
        sympathise with, and whose personality is attractive to
        us. Social life is just communication between like minds. Who taught Indians to
        exploit friendship for advancing ones interest,
        which is the worst feature of social life among us? And
        who made this motives cropping up in every social
        relationship? This is the cause of aversion,
        distressfulness, dithery. To achieve happiness with
        others is to be more ready to give than to receive. To be
        unselfish is essential for it. AVTAR NARAIN
        CHOPRAKurukshetra
 * *
        * * |