![]() |
B U S I N E S S | ![]() Monday, June 21, 1999 |
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
![]() |
|
Plan to increase PDS wheat
allocation NEW DELHI, June 20 The Food Ministry has mooted a proposal for consideration of the Union Cabinet to hike wheat allocation for the poor by 50 per cent, which will entail an additional subsidy burden of Rs 2000 crore in 1999-2000. Refineries await price decontrol ONE of the segments our research team has been very bullish about for the last six months is the refinery industry. With mutual funds now targeting the mopping up of sector specific funds, it comes as no surprise to us that one of the sectors in vogue is refineries. |
![]() |
IDBI to look into
Hytaisun sickness
|
|
US-64 scheme revives
hopes of dividend
|
||||||
![]() ![]() |
Plan to increase PDS wheat allocation NEW DELHI, June 20 (PTI) The Food Ministry has mooted a proposal for consideration of the Union Cabinet to hike wheat allocation for the poor by 50 per cent, which will entail an additional subsidy burden of Rs 2000 crore in 1999-2000. The new scheme, proposed barely months before the country goes to the Lok Sabha polls, envisages enhanced wheat allocation under the public distribution system (PDS) for those below the poverty line (BPL). Under the proposal, BPL families will receive 50 per cent of more at 15 kg per month, up from the current level of 10 kg. The Ministry has estimated the subsidy dole-out through the higher grain allocation of about 36 lakh tonnes at Rs 2000 crore and a Cabinet note has already been prepared, Food Ministry officials told PTI. The officials said the enhanced allocation will be a one-time exception as it has been devised as a means to dispose of the excess wheat stocks with the Food Corporation of India (FCI). The Food Ministry proposal comes in the wake of a bumper wheat procurement of more than 14 million tonnes by the FCI and other State Government agencies during the current rabi season taking the mandatory wheat stocks to over 22 million tonnes against the buffer stock norms of 40 lakh tonnes. The officials expressed optimism that the proposal will be cleared by the Cabinet soon. Under the targeted public distribution system (TDPS), launched in June 1997, 10 kg of foodgrain are issued to all families below the poverty line. While the Central Government fixes an issue price, State Governments are free to finalise the end retail prices of the foodgrains supplied through the PDS except in the case of foodgrains sold to the BPL families. The offtake of the wheat and rice under the PDS is estimated to be between 16 to 20 million tonnes annually. The public distribution system covers 16.5 crore people of which six crore are below the poverty line category. The government sells wheat to the poor at Rs 2.50 a kg as against the economic cost of about Rs 8.08 per kg and to those above the poverty line category at Rs 6.50. In the case of rice the economic cost is worked out to Rs 10.76 as against the price of Rs 4.52 per kg for BPL and Rs 9.05 for APL in the PDS. The government estimated the subsidy allocation for food at Rs 8,200 crore in 1999-2000 against last years revised estimate of Rs 8,700 crore. A major portion of the food subsidy is used for purchase of foodgrain by the FCI for supply through PDS at procurement prices fixed by the government from time to time. The government reimburses to the FCI the difference between economic cost and central issue price as the food subsidy. To get over the excess
stock of wheat in the state account, the Food Ministry
had earlier allowed the FCI to sell one million tonnes of
wheat to domestic roller flour millers, besides allowing
exports of the same amount. |
Refineries
await price decontrol ONE of the segments our research team has been very bullish about for the last six months is the refinery industry. With mutual funds now targeting the mopping up of sector specific funds, it comes as no surprise to us that one of the sectors in vogue is refineries. UTI, the Big Daddy of all mutual funds, too has targeted this segment under its ongoing Umbrella Fund issue. The refinery industry has been in the news following the decision to deregulate it. It is opined that deregulation will prove beneficial to the large sized companies, whereas the small sized companies are likely to suffer from deregulation and open market scenario. The three large players, Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL) and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL) stand to gain the most. The domestic oil sector has hitherto been almost totally regulated by the Controlling Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas. The control of this authority on the sector extended to various aspects like fixation of market price, planning and recommendation of crude/product imports, fixation of product and product mix, fixation of retention prices to be paid to the players for their refining products, fixation of profit margins, etc. The control has had its effect on the players in the industry. This is evident from the fact that the international trend of oil companies having interest in exploration, production, refining and marketing is not prevalent in India. The players in India are engaged in only one or two of these activities. However, the scenario is changing following the announcement of decontrol. The downstream companies could venture into activities of exploration and production and subsequently the upstream players could make a foray into refining and marketing. The industry is now accelerating the decontrol process. The price hike and the market determined pricing are steps taken by the government to deregulate the sector. The hike in price has more or less put domestic prices in tune with those globally. The other issues to be tackled while moving towards decontrol are the duties and taxes aspect. Thus, revenue losses and revenue sharing concepts must also be taken into account. The government is however circumspect about tampering with the subsidy on kerosene. However, at present, this does not, at least as yet, seem to be a cause for concern as the surplus from petrol should negate the outflow to some extent. As per schedule, the
total decontrol is expected to be completed within the
next four to five years. It will be interesting to see at
what point of time the government will move away from the
administered price mechanism (APM). The post-decontrol
period will result in the companies getting full proceeds
from their products, whereas previously they gained fixed
returns under APM. Thus, the players will witness wide
fluctuations in profits after decontrol. While it is
undoubtedly, the three large players, who are likely to
benefit the most from deregulation, it will be
interesting to see how the smaller players perform after
decontrol. |
IDBI to look into Hytaisun sickness NEW DELHI, June 20 (UNI) IDBI will scan the accounts of Hytaisun Magnetics Limited to verify the companys claim for sickness and submit a report to the BIFR. The BIFR, in a hearing recently to ascertain whether the company has actually become sick, directed the OA to specifically report within a month as to whether the networth of the company had been fully eroded by the accumulated losses as on March 31, 1997, and also check whether the balance sheet as on the same date presented a fair and true picture of the companys accounts. On a review of form A submitted by the company, the Bench noted that its networth of Rs 22.923 crore consisting of paid-up capital of Rs 15.59 crore and free reserves of Rs 7.34 crore had been wiped out by accumulated losses of Rs 32.88 crore as on March 31, 1997. Incorporated in 1988, Hytaisun Magnetics commenced production in 1993 after an investment of Rs 45.79 crore in plant and machinery. The unit has been closed since January 1998. Madurai cements: The BIFR has drafted a revival plan for the sick Madurai Cements Limited (MCL) envisaging repair of equipment and overhauling the plant before restarting the unit. The Rs 40 lakh scheme for the company engaged in the manufacture of ordinary land cement at Manamadurai (Tamil Nadu) comprises repair and overhauling expenditure to the tune of Rs 15 lakh factory salary of Rs 2.9 lakh and EB dues of Rs 2.5 lakh. Other major components of the draft scheme include miscellaneous expenditure of Rs 9 lakh and provision of contingencies of Rs 10.6 lakh. The cost of the scheme
is proposed to be financed by way of interest free
unsecured loan from the promoters (Rs 30.7 lakh) and cash
at hand of Rs 9.3 lakh. |
Bill Gates is still richest in world NEW YORK, June 20 (AFP) The rich are getting richer, but Microsoft chief Bill Gates is still the richest person in the world with a fortune valued at $ 90 billion, according to the US magazine Forbes Global. But the combined wealth of the worlds top 200 billionaires is worth more than $ 1trillion, more than double what they were worth a decade ago, the magazine says in its July 5 issue. As of April 30, 1999 Forbes cut-off date for the list, the seven richest persons in the world were Americans, followed by Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal ($ 15 billion) Germanys Albrecht family ($ 13.6 billion); and Hong Kong promoter Li Ka-Shing ($ 12.7 billion). Trailing behind Gates were Americans Warren Buffett ($ 36 billion); Paul Allen ($ 30 billion); Steve Ballmer ($ 19.5 billion); Philip Anschutz ($ 16.5 billion); Michael Dell ($ 16.5 billion); and S. Robson Walton ($ 15.8 billion). Forbes also listed billionaires who either inherited their money or who are living off their investments. Among the richest of
these billionaires are the Swiss families Oeri, Hoffman
and Sacher ($ 17 billion); Liliane Betten Ourt of France
($ 13.9 billion); the Haniel family of Germany ($ 12.4
billion); and Curt Englehorn and his family, who are
American but live in Bermuda ($ 12 billion). |
US-64 scheme revives hopes of dividend MUMBAI, June 20 (PTI) The rise in the net asset value (NAV) of US-64, Unit Trust of Indias (UTI) flagship scheme to Rs 13.85 has raised hopes of the trust declaring reasonable dividends for the year 1998-99. While officially UTI Executives were unwilling to commit themselves to any specific figure, sources said that gradual rise in NAV has come as a definite relief for the institution as now it would be able to offer a proper re-purchase price to its investors. In November last year the scheme had repurchased units at Rs 14.40 while the sale price was at Rs 14.70. The scheme had a NAV of slightly more than Rs 9.50 at the end of June 1998, in May this year, the NAV rose to Rs 11.05, with the fund managers indulging in judicious portfolio turnover and shoring up its debt portfolio. In less than a month, the NAV of the scheme was managed to cross Rs 13 and according to market sources, before UTIs year ending on June 30, 1999 the NAV might just come up to Rs 14 per unit. The Deepak Parekh Committee report on US-64 had warned that the trust might not be able to able to pay a reasonable levels. However, the recent
upsurge in the equities market with the stock market
sensitive index breaching the 4000-mark had helped in
appreciation of the schemes investment portfolio,
sources said. |
How banks
should not deal with SSI sickness BANK credit to SSI units is erratic in more than one sense. If it is inadequate and untimely on the one hand, it is made costlier through arbitrary means. Sickness in this sector is becoming widespread. Even in dealing with sickness, banks attitude is self-defeating, causing losses to them. Consultancy company Mckinseys partner has estimated that the ratio of NPAs to total loans was 16% in 1998 but as per estimates based on international accounting norms this ratio is 20-21%. It has further revealed that public sector banks are over staffed to the extent of 30-35% and it is one of the reasons for making them sick. So weak or sick banks can only make borrowers sick. Sickness in the SSI sector may be gauged from the fact that even the SBI had to write off Rs 666.80 crore in 1997-98 against Rs 293.67 in 1996-97. The total debts written off by 27 PSBs in 1997-98 was Rs 2800 crore. Banks apply almost the same financial risk rating to SSI units as to large units. Economy of scale in both cases is widely different and is not comparable. Current ratio of 1.33 attracts full marks and score gradually decreases to 1.0 when score is zero. The Naik Committee has made this ratio irrelevant and intends to lend SSI units on the basis of turn over. Banks are flouting the norms of this committee. For rating the optimum current ratio can be 1.25. Total outside loan and tangible networth norms are also arbitrary and chosen to hurt this vulnerable sector. Some banks count family unsecured loans as part of equity while others do not do so. SBI, supposedly the champion of the SSI sector, does not count this as capital. This reduces the score and interest rate is higher. The parameter based on profit to determine interest is most undesirable. Profit margins in the SSI sector are very thin and vary according to market conditions. Ratio of PBDIT/Interest is kept too high for maximum score. Even the bottom seems high. This parameter should be eliminated. Similarly ratio of profit after tax to sales is too high. This is a deliberate attempt to increase the interest rates for the SSI sector. Accepted return on capital at 20% is too high. Even the bottom of 10% is unachievable. Banks differ on the modes of commuting profit. Interest on the capital of the partners and the salaries to them are not counted in the profit. This is quite illogical. In actual terms these amounts are not withdrawn but are segregated for income tax purpose. In view of rising sickness, policies to deal with it should be such as to cause minimum loss to the bank. Banks usually run to DRT simply to transfer their problem without watching the bank interest. After obtaining decrees from DRT, banks have to auction the mortgaged assets. In most of the cases the auction fetches low amounts which have no relevance to the realisable amounts. If on the other hand, the sale is done through mutual co-operation between the bank and the borrower, much higher amounts can be realised. Some banks have even suggested that they should be allowed to evolve an amnesty scheme on the lines of the Kar Vivad Scheme. The Government has directed banks to encourage bank-specific settlement advisory committees (SACs). The scope of these committees has been kept very narrow and will not serve any purpose. The Government and banks have infact no pains when a single large scale sick unit drains away several hundred crores. SAIL has sought waiver of its loan of Rs 4500 crore from the Steel Development Fund and the Government is considering this actively. If a small steel unit drains away Rs 1 or 2 crore, it is subjected to all sorts of legal actions. This can hardly be termed as fair play in a democratic country. A number of studies have clearly established that the major cause for large scale incidence of sickness in the SSI sector is the unavailability of adequate and timely working capital finance from the banks. The RBI and the SBI have
evolved a novel idea which intends to tie up with top
corporate clients of small and medium scale units for
recommending loans to them. This is good but will serve
only a limited purpose. |
Petro Fund dark horse? Issue: UTI Growth Sectors Fund Opens: 27.5.99, Closes: 26.6.99 UTI has chosen to swim with the tide and has forayed into the market with an umbrella fund titled UTI Growth Sectors Fund. On offer for investors under this umbrella are five options, namely the Brand Value Fund, the Pharma and Healthcare Fund, the Software Fund, the Petro Fund and the Services Sector Fund. Notably, all these funds are open-ended with daily sale and repurchase options. To start with, each of these funds would invest as much as 90 per cent of their respective corpus in the equities of companies engaged in the specified sectors. Anyone worth his salt at the bourses would know that pharma, software and FMCG are there of the most potent sectors going, and also that there are already a few sector specific funds focussing on these sectors. To that extent, this offering seems to have come a little late in the day and it now really boils down to a matter of timing. These sector funds will distribute dividend annually subject to its being able to generate a net income of at least Re 1 per unit during the year, and in case the net income is lesser, the fund will not declare any dividend during that year. Instead, the earned income will be carried forward and clubbed with the subsequent years income. The initial offering for these funds which opened on May 27, 1999 will close on June 28, 1999. Investors entering the fund during this period would be eligible for the units without any load, as also while existing it. While this entry load would be zero even thereafter, there would be an exit load of 3 per cent for those who come in later. There is also a switchover facility within the different sector funds, albeit at the NAV rate. While the minimum investible sum for each fund is Rs 5000 to start with, subsequent investments have to be made in multiples of Rs 1000. What is really notewothy is the fact that while the NAV, repurchase and resale would be done on a daily basis, UTI will use the historic pricing policy, as opposed to the more commonly used prospective pricing policy, to arrive at the NAV. Historic pricing here means price based on the previous days NAV, whereas prospective pricing is based on the following days NAV. While the advantage here is that the historic system enables investors to know the exact price at which they are entering and existing the fund, it has an inbuilt disadvantage too given that it remains vulnerable to manipulation by operators especially in a volatile market. Another major development here is that UTI will disclose the portfolio of each of the sector funds on a quarterly basis. The innovative features here are the Brand Value Fund and the Services Sector Fund. The Brand Value Fund will be investing in companies with a strong brand-equity. Interestingly, this fund would encompass not only companies from the FMCG sector but others with strong brand names like Pidilite Industries. The Services Sector Funds purview would extend to companies engaged in sectors like infotech, entertainment, banking, hotels and telecom. While the former would be treading on safer ground, the latter would to some extent be testing hitherto turbulent waters. While the risk taken could result in lower returns, it must be remembered that the markets often reward contrarian views. To that extent, those with some penchant for a risk-reward tradeoff could take a closer look at the Services Sector Fund. The dark horse here could well turn out to be the Petro Fund, notwithstanding the fact that the share prices of the majors from this segment and already on the rebound. Issue: SQL Star International Opens: 18.6.99 Closes: 24.6.99 Issue size: Rs 14.30 crores Offer price: Rs 55 per share The Prime objective of this issue is to raise funds to part-finance the expansion of its software and consulting division as also its education division. The self-estimated project cost stands at Rs 25.26 crore which is proposed to be met through issue proceeds (Rs 14.30 crore), promoters funds (Rs 1.93 crore), internal accruals (Rs 7.03 crore) and a term loan of Rs 2 crore from the State Bank of India. Perhaps, the estimated project cost would have enjoyed enhanced credibility had it been appraised even by the SBI. Although the financial track-record of the company has been satisfactory, it is nothing worth writing home about and it is in this light that one feels the need to take SQLs self-estimated profitability projections with a pinch of salt. Investors are being asked to park their funds in a company engaged in a segment that is slowly but surely getting crowded and although there is scope for growth therein, it is unlikely to be of the exponential kind witnessed hitherto. Although this issue
cannot be written off, its pricing definitely appears to
be on the higher side and one wonders whether investors
would invest therein or simply look around for better
pickings from the same segment in the secondary market. |
Inflation declines to two-year low NEW DELHI, June 20 (PTI) The annual rate of inflation declined to a 87-week low of 3.53 per cent for the week ended June 5, due to a fall in prices of primary food articles, especially fruits. This is the lowest inflation since September 27, 1997, when it touched 3.47 per cent. During the week, the annual inflation based on wholesale price index fell by 0.33 percentage points to 3.53 per cent (provisional) from 3.86 per cent (P) in the previous week. The inflation rate was way higher at 7.04 per cent a year ago. Inflation has been falling since the beginning of the current financial year despite an increase in the overall index. While the rate of
increase in prices shed over one percentage point since
April 3, 1999, the index for all commodities (base:
1981-82=100) rose from 354.7 to 357.5 during the period. |
H |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Chandigarh | Editorial | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |