![]() |
B U S I N E S S | ![]() Monday, March 22, 1999 |
weather n
spotlight today's calendar |
![]() |
|
Rice millers face sales tax problems CHANDIGARH, March 21 The adoption of different methodologies and procedures by different sales tax authorities in Haryana has created problems for rice millers, while bringing no additional revenue to the State exchequer. Problems of rice millers relate to reimbursement of the differential tax from the Food Corporation of India through the Haryana Food and Supplies Department. |
![]() |
It happens
only in Ludhiana... LUDHIANA : Subtlety is not exactly a strong point with the yuppies in Ludhiana. Ostentatious lifestyle, display of wealth and conspicuous consumption seem to come naturally to them.However, do not be harsh in your judgement if you come across a yuppy wielding two, instead of the usual one, mobile phone. |
|
|
|||||||
![]() ![]() |
Rice millers
face sales tax problems CHANDIGARH, March 21 The adoption of different methodologies and procedures by different sales tax authorities in Haryana has created problems for rice millers, while bringing no additional revenue to the State exchequer. Problems of rice millers relate to reimbursement of the differential tax from the Food Corporation of India through the Haryana Food and Supplies Department. The differential tax is the difference between the sales tax imposed on paddy and that on the rice shelled out of that paddy. Since 75 per cent of the non-basmati rice is sold by the millers to the FCI, they pass on the differential tax to the corporation. The corporation, however, does not pay differential tax to the millers at the time of the purchase of rice. It is only after the sales tax authorities recover the tax from the millers that they can claim reimbursement from the FCI. In the past years the millers used to pay differential tax only after the authorities had scrutinised their sales tax returns and completed the assessment proceedings. This used to take years. To speed up the flow of the coffers of the State, the sales tax authorities changed the procedure some time ago. They insisted that the millers should pay differential tax to the State along with their tax returns. This created a cash crunch with the millers who could not claim the differential tax on the rice sold to the FCI as levy till the sales tax authorities passed assessment orders. The Karnal sales tax authorities appreciated the problem of the millers and found out a way out to mitigate the difficulty of the millers without causing any revenue loss to the State. Sources in the milling industry say the Karnal authorities started issuing provisional assessment orders, permissible under law, to the millers, who on the basis of the provisional orders, approached the FCI for reimbursement. The Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Karnal, Mr R.C. Mittal, said they were issuing a certificate of differential tax paid by the millers so that they could claim reimbursement from FCI. The tax authorities in the other districts, while insisted that the millers should pay differential tax along with their tax returns, however, did not issue provisional assessment orders or a certificate of payment of differential tax to the millers, who have to wait for at least a couple of years for the assessment orders. The Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Kurukshetra, Mr B.S. Dinodia, said provisional assessment could not be done only for differential tax. The provisional assessment was done in only those cases where an assessee was either a big tax payer or his bona fides were doubtful. A miller, whose money is locked up with the State government, said if a certificate of payment of differential tax or a provisional assessment order was issued to the assessee, it would not cause any revenue loss to the state. On the other had, such a step would help the milling industry which was currently passing through a very bad phase. The differential tax was to be paid by the FCI which reimbursed it to the millers only after the sales tax authorities certified liability of the miller in this respect. He said the Chief
Minister, Mr Bansi Lal, should either direct the sales
tax authorities to adopt a uniform pro-assessee policy
throughout the State or he should use his good offices
with the FCI to change its procedure for reimbursement of
differential tax to the millers. |
It happens
only in Ludhiana... LUDHIANA : Subtlety is not exactly a strong point with the yuppies in Ludhiana. Ostentatious lifestyle, display of wealth and conspicuous consumption seem to come naturally to them. However, do not be harsh in your judgement if you come across a yuppy wielding two, instead of the usual one, mobile phone. He may actually be trying not to be a spendthrift. Persons carrying two cellphones is a fairly common sight in this megacity. One of the cellphones has a Spice SIM card while the other has the Essar connection. The Spice cellphone is used to call any DoT or cellphone number in the megacity and elsewhere. Essar is used primarily to receive calls or for making Essar-to-Essar calls. The Spice cellphone service is paid and is, therefore, used very sparingly. Due to a peculiar problem which the company has been unable to resolve so far, the Essar cellphone provides free airtime in Ludhiana, although the choice of numbers one can call is extremely limited. Says one subscriber: The Essar cellphone in Ludhiana is, at present, almost comparable to a pager because while it can receive calls, almost all outgoing calls are barred. The only numbers which can be reached are Essar cellphones in Ludhiana, Chandigarh and Jalandhar. But even this is a great facility, especially when it is free. We find it extremely useful. Little wonder, the Essar SIM cards, which were going abegging some time ago because of the inability of the company to provide DoT connectivity in Ludhiana, have now begun to command a premium in the market. People have suddenly come to realise that Essar service is useful even without the DoT connection. Ludhiana is the only city in Punjab where Essar cellphone company continues to provide free air time to its subscribers even a year after it came on the scene. Initially, the free air time was for a month or so. But when the company was unable to provide DoT connectivity within the stipulated period, free air time was extended for a few months more. Finally, free time was allowed indefinitely but all outgoing calls from cellphones in Ludhiana to DoT and non-Essar cellphones were barred. It is for reasons entirely beyond our control says Mr Vijay Kaul, Vice-President, Essar Cellphone. We have been trying out best to secure DoT connectivity in Ludhiana but to no avail. They are insisting on advance payment of certain amount of fee before connectivity is provided. We, however, feel that since the whole matter of cellphone licence fee structure is being examined by the Government of India and the courts, connectivity should be given immediately in the overall interests of the subscribers pending the final outcome. That is where the matter is stuck at present... Mr Kaul says that he is
aware that even with limited service in Ludhiana, Essar
SIM card has begun to command a premium. But we are
not issuing any new SIM cards in Ludhiana. Subscribers
are free to use the old SIM cards the way they deem fit. |
Government
pandering to steel lobby? The Director-General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) issued notification on December 11, 1998 last year to the effect that import of hot rolled coils (HRC) would be permitted only if the minimum CIF value was $302 per metric tonne. The anti-dumping body had fixed import price at $ 250. International price at that time hovered around $ 240 and in some countries as low as less than $200. This huge difference in the fixed price created a lot of suspicion. On the face of it there is no justification for fixing higher import price when steel prices in the international market are going down each day. From this came the accusation of doling up of Rs 5000 crore to a cartel of HRC producers. It is alleged that two bureaucrats in steel and commerce ministries who matter in this case are service batch-mates of a chairman of a public sector unit of steel sector and the latter co-ordinated the operation. Subsequent to the fixing of import price HRC producers formed a cartel and decided not to honour any back log orders from January 4, this year onwards. Increase in price of Rs 1,900 per tonne was announced and supplies were stopped. Does this not manifest lobby-driven short termism on the part of the government. Mere denials from government do not take away the sting of the allegation. It has to answer few questions. How can the user industry survive at this arbitrarily fixed price when competitors in other countries get at much lower price? Would not our already dwindling exports be hurt? Would not user industry be tempted to resort to over invoicing which simply means hawala transactions? Would not small investors be losers if steel using companies go sick? Some decisions on the pick and choose basis have been taken on few other items like acrylic fibre, acetylene blacks and styrene butadiene rubber. The charge of pandering to lobbies gains ground when seen from another angle. The steel sector of the country is in doldrums. Most of the smaller units have closed down. Many delegations have been meeting the high ups but not a single step has been taken to save them. This landed the banks and FIs in deep trouble as huge amounts have been sunk in these units. Only a few administrative steps with small rationalisation of central excise rules could avert this catastrophe. On the other hand government is pressuring FIs to bail out the same bigger units with fresh heavy doses of finance. For one company alone package of Rs 1,700 crore is being prepared. The government reduced custom duty on kerosene oil from 30 per cent (plus 2 per cent special duty) to zero for this company (Reliance) only by issuing mid-year notification on September 8, 1998. Custom duty on kerosene oil was raised from zero to 30 per cent in the budget. Simultaneously Nirmas case for similar reduction of duty on N-paraffin was rejected. However, later on Nirma must also have followed the beaten track and got exemption. The pampered company is going to manufacture Naptha. In this budget Finance Minister seems to have taken care to impose 5 per cent custom duty on Naptha to protect this company from international competition. Part of the reason for
these goof ups is the growing size and power of
Prime Ministers office (PMO). This tendency started
in Indira Gandhis time and every Prime Minister
strengthened it gradually. Bureaucrat take decision in
the PMO which can be embarrassing. For instance while
formulating policy for road sector they led PM that 6000
km of road shall cost Rs 28,000 crore where as this cost
is Rs 60,000 crore. The Government had to correct it
later after giving wrong figure to Parliament. Can such
bureaucrats be relied on policy making. |
Rockland Leas I deposited Rs 10000 in Rockland Leasing Limited, Chandigarh in the month of December, 1997 for one year. I have deposited the cheque No 0049828 in December, 1998 in my account (which was given to me against FD) was returned by the bank with the remarks payment stopped by the drawer. I had sent many reminders to Delhi and Chandigarh office of the company but there is no result. Abhay
Joshi Woolworth I hold shares of Woolworth (India) with Folio No 054344. My dividend for 92-93 amounting to Rs 170 stands deposited with Register of Companies, West Bengal-II, Calcutta vide Si No 726 dated 15.2.96 of Form-1 as unclaimed. I applied for refund on 5.11.97 but despite several reminders, no response has been received. Satwant
Singh Bakhshi Ross Murarka I sent 15 debentures with Folio No K-9489 allotment No 8288 dated 29.4.86 to Ross Murarka Finance Ltd Bombay now named R.M. Financial Services Ltd. Dr Annie Basant Road, Worli, Bombay for redemption on 21.7.97. Till to-date I have not received the redemption amount along with interest. Kamlesh
Abrol UTI I am not getting 20 per cent dividend of the following units period ending June 1998 40096 0010261225 (409.697), 400970200857673 (40.970). I have written to Chairman UTI, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002, but I have not received the dividend. Yash
Pal Singh Stiefel Und Schuh I applied for 800 shares of Stiefel Und Schuh (I) Ltd in 1995. I had been allotted only 100 shares against Folio No 014437. A refund pay order of the balance amount (worth Rs 3000) was sent to me by the above said company. The refund pay order had been lost from my side. I requested the company to send duplicate refund pay order as I had lost the original one. On reconciliation, the company realised that refund pay order remained unpaid. Despite many reminders I have not received the duplicate one. |
H |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Himachal Pradesh | Jammu & Kashmir | | Chandigarh | Editorial | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |