![]() |
M A I L B A G | ![]() Tuesday, October 12, 1999 |
|
weather ![]() today's calendar |
Kashmiris disinterest in militancy THIS refers to Mr A.N. Dars article Kashmiris disinterest in militancy: measures to end the menace. (September 24). The Kargil war is over; but the risk of a general holocaust engulfing the Indian subcontinent may have grown more acute. In the wake of the Kargil war Pakistans Talibanised and disintegrated state apparatus has gone back to its earlier plan to destabilise India. Can anyone explain how militancy could have flared up in the valley when every other indicator shows that the Kashmiris are (true to the authors observation too) sick of militancy and long for a return to peace, normal politics and good, honest government? It is important to distinguish between the support Pakistan is giving to the jehadis and the support it gave to the Kashmiri militants of 1990-91. Both were hostile acts, but in 1999-93, Pakistans role was more passive than it is today. The support Pakistan is giving to the jehadis now is of an entirely different kind. Except for a handful of left-over cadres of the Hizbul Mujahideen, the vast majority are strangers to Kashmir. They are from Pakistani and Afghan outfits and those which owe their allegiance to Osama bin Laden. Besides, Pakistans ISI has taken upon itself the task of attacking soft targets in India. There is thus a mindless destructiveness behind Pakistans assaults that makes the challenge India faces qualitatively different from any that the world has known, at least in the 20th century. This raises a crucial question: if Pakistan continues to escalate the level of violence in Kashmir and the rest of India, should India fight the new war on its own or in its enemys territory? Cold logic demands that India should take the next war to Pakistan and not delay it any more. The rationale for this is as old as history. Partition robbed India of its natural frontiers and left it facing the classic dilemma that all powers with land frontiers have faced when threatened by turmoil across their borders. Their natural response has been to expand and expand till they reached a natural barrier that can reinforce their statehood. India cannot easily do this today because the Pakistani military is simply waiting for a chance to unleash a pre-emptive nuclear strike, regardless of the consequences. But there is another option too. This is to alert the international community to the choice that Pakistan is forcing upon us today and enlist its help in bringing that country under control. This will not be possible without a sustained, quiet dialogue and a willingness to meet the worlds security concerns more than halfway. K.M. VASHISHT
|
Probity in public life The article on Gandhis bacteriologically provoked health problem may have been thought-provoking 75 years ago, if the Indian public had been aware of it. Dont they say, things that you do not know, cannot hurt you? But we did tide over it. On the other hand, we had more serious problems at hand quite recently, but for some reason no one cared. I refer to Prime Minister Nehrus suffering from syphilis. No doubt, all his personal doctors were aware of the deadly malady. |
![]() |
![]() |
| Nation
| Punjab | Haryana | Jammu & Kashmir | Chandigarh | | Editorial | Business | Sport | | Mailbag | Spotlight | World | 50 years of Independence | Weather | | Search | Subscribe | Archive | Suggestion | Home | E-mail | |