TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Let the gurdwara be: SC junks Delhi Waqf Board’s plea claiming rights on property

The apex court highlights the high court’s orders noting the functioning of a gurdwara at the contested property since 1947
"Even if there is any claim, you should relinquish that claim saying a gurdwara is already there,” a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the Delhi Waqf Board counsel. Tribune file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea by the Delhi Waqf Board which claimed possession of a property on which a gurdwara is located in the national capital’s Shahdara area. Ruling in favour of the gurdwara, the apex court rejected the board’s contention that the property in question was waqf.

Advertisement

“There is a gurdwara, let it be. Even if there is any claim, you should relinquish that claim saying a gurdwara is already there,” a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma told the Delhi Waqf Board counsel who argued for possession of the gurdwara property.

Advertisement

The SC was hearing the board’s petition challenging a September 2010 Delhi High Court order, which rejected its suit for possession of the stated property. The Board submitted that the property in question was a waqf property and had been in use as a waqf since time immemorial.

Arguing for the board, the counsel flagged findings of a trial judge that a mosque existed there.

The counsel further argued that one of the defendant himself admitted that there was a mosque and “some kind of a gurdwara” which was not registered.

Advertisement

The SC in its orders dismissing the board’s petition today said, “Not some kind of a gurdwara, it is a fully functional gurudwara.”

The apex court highlighted the high court’s orders noting the functioning of a gurdwara at the contested property since 1947.

Advertisement
Tags :
#DelhiWaqfBoard#GurdwaraProperty#WaqfDisputeGurdwaraindianlawLandDisputeReligiousPropertyShahdaraSupremeCourtsupremecourtruling
Show comments
Advertisement