|
Balance of power in
Asia
India should join partners like
Vietnam and Japan
G Parthasarathy
The
21st century is often described as “Asia’s century”, primarily because of the sustained and rapid economic growth across the continent. While the US can no longer unilaterally decide the course of events in Asia, it will remain a key player in moulding the balance of power within Asia. This balance of power will primarily be determined by the interplay between a rapidly growing, militaristic and jingoistic China, an aging but technologically innovative Japan and India, still uncertain about how to manage this triangular relationship to its best advantage. India and Japan have no territorial or maritime boundary issues which can escalate bilateral tensions. China, however, has adopted policies on land and maritime boundaries, which could lead to escalating tensions with India, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Indonesia.Narendra Modi's high-profile visit to Japan and the forthcoming visit of President Xi Jinping to India, together with his visits to Pakistan (since postponed) and Sri Lanka, should be seen in this context of emerging power equations in Asia. It has long been Beijing’s effort to “contain” India within South Asia. Nothing else can explain its policies of equipping Pakistan not merely with tanks, warships and fighter aircraft, but also by promoting the development of Pakistan's nuclear weapons and missile production capabilities. This has been accompanied by China’s untiring efforts to undermine Indian influence in Nepal, Bhutan, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and the Maldives. China took note of Mr. Modi’s comment in Japan: “Everywhere around us, we see an 18th century expansionist mindset; encroaching on another country, intruding on other's waters, invading other countries and capturing territory”. While noting that Mr. Modi had not named any country, China’s official mouthpiece, the “Global Times”, observed: “Japan is located faraway from India. Abe’s harangue on the Indo-Pacific concept makes Indians comfortable. It is South Asia, where New Delhi has to make its presence felt. However, China is a neighbour it cannot move away from. Sino-Indian ties can in no way be counter-balanced by the Japan-India friendship”. Beijing’s message to New Delhi thus was: “You are merely a South Asian power, bordering a strong China. We will move across the Indian Ocean at will. You should, however, not dare use your relationship with Japan to transgress into what you and Japan describe as the Indo-Pacific”. China has no intention of changing its policy of “strategic containment” of India, even if India is useful in promoting its interests in BRICS and G-20. The visit of Mr. Modi to Japan has yielded substantial progress in industrial collaboration with a target of $35 billion of FDI in the coming five years together with a projected increase of Japanese ODI. Defence industry collaboration and joint exercises between the two navies, both in the Indian and Pacific Oceans, are to be expanded. Japan will be playing a key role in the development of industrial corridors in India. It is removing restrictions on collaboration in space and defence industries. Indo-Japanese collaboration in exploration of rare earths will erode the Chinese monopoly in this sector. We should welcome growing cooperation in industry and infrastructure with China, if it can match the transfer of technology and development of work skills that Japan is ready to provide. There is much we can learn from the speed and efficiency that characterises the construction of infrastructure projects in China. India's trade deficit with China in 2012 was $39.1 billion. A recent RIS study commissioned by the RBI has noted that such a deficit is "unsustainable". This trade deficit is unsustainable largely because of Chinese non-tariff barriers on key industries like pharmaceuticals, steel and auto components. Moreover, India receives discriminatory treatment in the registration of its products and services like banking, insurance, warehousing and freight forwarding. Some 41 products have been identified, which India exports significantly worldwide, which are prevented from entering the Chinese market by non-tariff barriers. These products include plastics, manmade filaments, electrical and optical machinery, and vehicles. The registration of Indian companies in China is deliberately made difficult. It takes three-five years to secure registration in China — a process that normally takes six months in India for Chinese companies. Some reciprocal measures are called for, including the imposition of higher tariffs on the import of power equipment manufactured in India. China is no hurry to resolve the border issue. It steadfastly avoids clearly defining where the Line of Actual Control lies in Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh. Better logistics across the Tibetan Plateau give its armed forces the advantage of far easier access to disputed areas. While contacts between military commanders have increased, face-offs along the LoC continue. Spelling out “guiding principles” for resolving the border issue, India and China agreed in April 2005 that the Sino-Indian boundary “should be along well defined and easily identifiable natural geographical features, to be mutually agreed upon” (Article VI). They also agreed that “The two sides shall safeguard due interests of their settled populations in the border areas” (Article VII). In accordance with this agreement, the border in Arunachal Pradesh should logically be an extension of China’s delineated border with Myanmar. In Ladakh the Karakoram mountains are the most prominent “identifiable natural geographical features” separating India and China. While India is strengthening its defences along the Sino Indian border, by raising new strike formations, improving communications and deploying frontline SU 30 Squadrons, our negotiators sometimes appear excessively defensive in dealing with their Chinese counterparts. India should join partners like Vietnam and Japan to build a stable balance of power in Asia. Given China’s intimidation of its neighbours on its maritime boundary claims, India should, at least, supply Brahmos anti-ship cruise missiles to friendly countries in the Indo-Pacific region like Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia to secure their maritime frontiers. At the same time, cooperation with China in multilateral forums like G20, the East Asia Summit and BRICS should be expanded and bilateral cooperation in areas like infrastructure, industry, communications and energy pursued vigorously.
 |
|
The science and art of ageing
The very act of living causes damage to our cells. Approaching old age with fear, hatred, and
anti-ageing feelings only worsens the reality
Suresh Rattan
Most
of us would like to live a long life, but not many would like to become old. We often associate old age with physical problems, mental slowness and social invisibility. Of course, there is some truth to all those facts about ageing. Living a long life necessarily brings in old age, because that is how our bodies are built. Preparing ourselves for this phase of life is much better than approaching it with fear, hatred and anti-ageing feelings. With scientific knowledge, we can learn, adopt, nurture and practise reliable methods towards healthy ageing and longevity.
Science behind ageing The scientific study of ageing is called gerontology, whereas geriatrics is the term for the clinical care and treatment of age-related diseases. Biogerontology is the study of the biological basis of ageing as to why and how we become old in the first place. The past 50 years of extensive ageing research on the biology of ageing have clarified and resolved numerous issues, misunderstandings and myths about ageing and old age. For example, the most common notion that our lifespan is predetermined and is fixed by either some supernatural powers or by specific ageing-genes in our cells, is scientifically incorrect. Biogerontology teaches that there are no ageing genes or gerontogenes that cause ageing. There is no enemy within. Genes are essential for our survival and genes do determine our ability to live and to maintain health. Our bodies, like all living systems, have evolved to survive and to reproduce. Evolution has developed numerous complex biochemical processes in each and every cell of the body for this. But these processes work efficiently for a limited period depending on the overall life history of a species. For example, animals, such as worms, insects, rats and mice, which are small in size, mature fast and reproduce in large numbers, generally have a short lifespan of a few days or weeks. On the other hand, larger animals, such as cows, horses, monkeys, and elephants, are slow-maturing, late reproducing and longer living. In scientific terms, the naturally required lifespan of a species is known as the essential lifespan (ELS). In natural conditions, it is rare that an animal survives beyond ELS because death occurs much earlier by chance owing to predation, infections and starvation. There is no need for any special genes to kill the organism. But in highly protected conditions, such as zoos and laboratories, animals can live much longer. For example, rats and mice survive in nature for less than a year, but in the protected laboratory conditions they can live for three to four years, a lifespan much longer than their natural ELS. Signs of ageing appear and all problems of old age occur during this period of life beyond ELS. A similar situation exists for human beings. As a species, our ELS is about 45 years only. In ancient times, very few people survived beyond, and becoming old was a privilege. In modern times, however, it is the greatest success story of mankind's innovations that most of us can expect to live much longer than our species’ ELS. And that is when we also face ageing and old age.
Paradox of life If there are no genes or other biochemical processes with a specific function of causing ageing, then why do we become old? The answer to this paradox lies in the processes of life itself. The very act of living causes damage in our cells. There are three major sources of damage within a cell. The first is the oxygen, which is essential for our survival, but it is also the source of chemically very reactive free radicals of many types. These chemicals are also produced inside the cell by the sun's UV-rays and by other chemicals in the environment. Free radicals have both a good and a bad side. On the good side, these are necessary for the normal functioning of the cells in cell-to-cell communication and in the immune system. On the bad side, if free radicals are in excess and are uncontrolled, these cause significant damage to DNA, proteins and other molecules, and can kill the cell. The second source of molecular damage is the food components, such as sugars and fats. We cannot live without them, but during their normal course of action, sugars and fats also damage each other and proteins and DNA in the cell. This can cause serious problems in the functioning of the organs and tissues such as the brain, muscles, eyes, bones, hormones, and the immune system. The third source of damage is the errors and mistakes happening in the normal biochemical processes of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis. These mistakes, occurring by chance, then cause mutations and other harmful effects, including cancers, cell death and other diseases. The paradox of life is balanced by the presence of complex networks of molecular, cellular and physiological systems for the maintenance, repair and defence. These defences generate “buffering capacity” or what is also called the “homeodynamic space”, in the body. Homeodynamic space gives us the ability to tolerate stress, to control the amount of damage, and to be able to change and adapt. These physiological signs of a healthy body are also the psychological measures of health. Ageing is mainly a shrinkage and loss of this homeodynamic space, which happens not due to any “enemy within”, but owing to the insufficiency of the friendly processes of maintenance and repair.
Achieving healthy ageing

Low- level stress triggered by exercise has a positive relationship with health.
Tribune photo: S Chandan
|
Ageing happens individually. No two persons become old in exactly the same way. No two parts of the body become old in exactly the same way. No two cells in the body become old in exactly the same way. Therefore the methods to maintain health in old age, and to extend healthspan, are also going to be person-specific; and no single miracle pill is going to completely stop or reverse ageing. Although a variety of cosmetic, nutritional and other lifestyle interventions are being promoted as "anti-ageing", none of them is more than a wishful thinking at present. However, a promising scientific approach towards healthy ageing being tested and developed is that of hormesis for maintaining health and homeodynamics. Hormesis is the positive relationship between low-level stress and health. Whereas uncontrolled and unwanted stress is negative and harmful, low level “stress of choice” is health beneficial. Moderate exercise is the best example of hormesis. Exercise initially increases the production of free radicals, acids and other harmful biochemicals in the body. In response, the repair and defence systems of the body protect and strengthen the homeodynamics. Hormesis has the potential to maintain health during ageing. Conditions that induce hormesis are called hormetins, and are categorised as nutritional, physical and mental hormetins. Several types of foods and food components, such as spices, flavonoids, polyphenols and micronutrients are nutritional hormetins. Sauna, breath control, and mental challenge, including meditation, are examples of physical and mental hormetins. Novel combinations of multi-hormetins are under scientific investigation; and within the next few years, a range of scientifically tested and reliable hormetins will become available. We surely need lifestyle adjustments, and biomedical, aesthetic and psycho-social means for maintaining health, beauty and identity in old age. Adopting an anti-ageing stance to old age is no solution to its physical, psychological and social realities. Spices, physical activity and mental engagement are very effective hormetic tools for maintaining health and for extending the
healthspan.
Long life and old age
go together
- Health is not a vague and idealistic notion of a perfect state of physical, mental and social well being, as defined by the WHO. Health is a practical measure of ADEQUATE physical and mental independence in the activities of daily living. The meaning of being healthy constantly changes with age in the context of adequacy. There should be no pressure in behaving like and competing with the younger generation. Old age sets us free from the strict and arbitrary norms of a stressful and competitive lifestyle. Maintaining visibility and dignity in old age is the path towards healthy and active long life. Repeated mental and physical challenge with "stress of choice" is the latest scientific and evidence-based healthy ageing approach. Pleasure, moderation and variety in food, physical activity and mental engagement are the basis for a long life and healthy old age.
- It is a great biomedical triumph that most of us can hope to live a much longer life than our species' natural lifespan of about 45 years. Living longer, however, also brings in old age along with all its good and not-so-good sides. Understanding the scientific basis of ageing and its inevitability can prepare us to accept the approaching old age in a positive and healthy manner. Correct scientific information will also help us to save ourselves from falling prey to the sellers of false promises, ineffective remedies and blind faith.
- All systems in our bodies are built for survival. There are no killer genes or chemicals in our cells, which have a pre-determined job of making us old and die. But the complex nature of our bodies does not allow for unlimited survival, and sooner or later one or the other system starts becoming weaker, dysfunctional and problematic. Using various technological tools and medicines for compensating or managing those changes is perfectly OK. There are no real anti-ageing drugs, because ageing is not a disease that can be cured.
- Being anti-ageing is being against an important phase of life. Pretending to be 26 when we are 62 is only going to create more mental confusion and more social and biological harms and risks. Ageing can be modulated and managed, and healthy old age can be achieved. Accepting and respecting our age is the first step towards a healthy and longer life.
Elderly woes
- India has around 100 million elderly at present, the number is expected to grow to 323 million by 2050.
- While paediatrics is a widely accepted specialised medical stream and paediatric consultants dominate most private and public hospital OPDs; geriatrics is little known. In fact, it is not even taught formally at most medical colleges in India.
- Elderly population in India is not uniform. They have different causes of morbidity spanning across several dimensions like gender, location and socio-economic status.
- Major healthcare facility is provided by the private sector. Most of these hospitals promote speciality like cardiology, orthopaedics, ophthalmology etc. which generates larger monetary returns rather than specialities like geriatrics.
- Currently, there are only eight regional centres across India with geriatric-care facility.
- There is a serious lack of properly trained geriatricians, although some institutions have started a structured geriatric training programme. Trained personnel in geriatrics are qualified abroad.
|
The writer is an internationally renowned biogerontologist, based at Aarhus University, Denmark.
 |