TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

High court rejects Patanjali’s petition against Rs 273-crore GST penalty

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Allahabad HC has dismissed Patanjali Ayurved Limited’s petition challenging Rs 273.50-crore GST penalty.

Advertisement

A division Bench rejected Patanjali’s argument that such penalties constitute criminal liability and can be imposed only after a criminal trial.

Advertisement

The Bench was of the view that tax authorities can impose penalties under Section 122 of the GST Act through civil proceedings without requiring criminal court trials.

The firm came under probe following intel about suspicious transactions involving firms with high Input Tax Credit (ITC) utilisation but no income tax credentials.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement