Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

India must seek balance in trade talks as US Trade Representative calls "India Difficult Nut to Crack": GTRI

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi [India], December 11 (ANI): India must insist on balanced outcomes in the ongoing trade negotiations with the United States and remain extremely cautious about extending concessions on agricultural crops or genetically modified (GMO) products, the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) has said in a detailed note.

Advertisement

The GTRI noted this after U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer, while briefing the U.S. Senate, stated that India continues to be "a very difficult nut to crack" in trade negotiations, particularly on accepting U.S. exports of certain row crops and meat products.

Advertisement

He informed senators that the U.S. trade team is currently in New Delhi working with Indian authorities to expand market access, especially in agriculture.

Greer added that despite challenges, India has been "quite forward-leaning" in recent talks and that the offers currently on the table are "the best we've ever received as a country," positioning New Delhi as a viable alternative market for American exporters.

He also said Washington is pushing to increase sales of biofuels derived from soybeans.

Advertisement

According to GTRI, row crops refer to globally traded, large-scale agricultural commodities grown in mechanised rows such as corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, rice, sugarcane, barley, sorghum and canola.

Many of these products are politically sensitive in India due to their link with farmer livelihoods and food security.

GTRI stated "New Delhi must insist on balance, not optics and should remain extremely cautious about giving concessions on agriculture crops or GMO products. If the U.S. is serious about partnership, it should first cut the punitive tariff on Indian exports from 50 per cent to 25 per cent".

GTRI noted that USTR's testimony provides an authentic glimpse into the ongoing U.S.-India trade discussions, but the narrative so far largely reflects Washington's expectations from India.

The talks appear heavily focused on opening India's markets for U.S. farm produce and biofuels, with little clarity on what the U.S. is ready to offer in terms of market access for Indian exports.

The think tank said Greer's remark that India's proposal is "the best the U.S. has ever received" is difficult to accept, especially when countries like Malaysia have conceded even core policy space in their trade agreements with Washington.

It added that New Delhi must prioritise balance over optics in negotiations. India should be extremely cautious about granting concessions on agricultural and GMO-related products, given their domestic sensitivity.

The note further advised that India should avoid making any binding commitments in the ongoing talks until the U.S. Supreme Court delivers its verdict on President Donald Trump's tariff authority.

The decision, GTRI said, could significantly reshape the entire negotiating landscape overnight, making premature concessions risky for New Delhi. (ANI)

(This content is sourced from a syndicated feed and is published as received. The Tribune assumes no responsibility or liability for its accuracy, completeness, or content.)

Advertisement
Tags :
agricultural exportsFarmer livelihoodsfood securityGTRIGtri reportindia agricultureindia exportsIndia trade talksmarket accesstariff reductionTradeTrade BalanceTrade challengesTrade concessionsTrade discussionsTrade NegotiationsTrade Partnershiptrade talksUS ExportsUS India tradeUS SenateUS tariffsUS-India relations
Show comments
Advertisement