TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Survey rules out fudging of GDP data, misestimation

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 31

Advertisement

The Economic Survey has debunked former Chief Economic Adviser Arvind Subramaniam’s claim that India’s GDP growth rate has been overstated by about 2.5 per cent due to changes in data sources and methodology for estimation.

Advertisement

The Survey explains away the setting up of the 28-member Standing Committee on Economic Statistics (SCES) headed by India’s former Chief Statistician to improve the quality of data as aimed at ramping up India’s statistical infrastructure.

After examining the evidence, leveraging existing academic literature and econometric methods, it says there is no lack of any concrete evidence in favour of a mis-estimated Indian GDP.

It came to this conclusion using models to study whether India’s GDP growth is higher than it would have been had its estimation methodology not been revised in 2011. “If the evidence of a mis-estimation is credible and robust, a radical upheaval of the estimation methodology should follow,” said the Survey while adding that given the cost of such a massive undertaking, it is important to be certain that there is a need to revisit the estimation methodology.

Advertisement

It found that if the models had incorrectly over-estimated the GDP growth by 2.7 per cent for India post-2011, then they should have also mis-estimated the GDP growth over the same time period for 51 other countries out of 95 countries in the sample. Several advanced economies such as the UK, Germany and Singapore turn out to have their GDPs mis-estimated when the econometric model is incompletely specified, thus hinting that the conclusions of the contrarian economists might be based on an analysis that was not exhaustive.

Interestingly, the Survey hinted at the absence of crony capitalism in India only on the basis of composition of the Sensex over the years. For the first 10 years since the Sensex’s inception in 1986, the firms that constituted the index barely changed; nearly all the firms were retained for the majority of the next decade. — TNS


How the last Survey went wrong

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement