TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Apex court vacates stay, liquor vends in Chandigarh to open today

A closed liquor shop in Sector 22 on Tuesday. Pradeep Tewari

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Supreme Court has paved the way for opening of liquor vends in the city from tomorrow.

Advertisement

On March 26, the Punjab and Haryana High Court had issued a notice of motion to the Chandigarh Administration for April 3 while ordering the maintenance of status quo on three petitions challenging the tendering process for liquor vends. The HC had ordered that vends allotted under the previous Excise Policy will not operate beyond March 31, while the new ones allotted through a tendering process will not start operations till April 3 – the next date of hearing in the case.

Advertisement

Disposing of a petition filed by the Chandigarh Administration, the apex court vacated the stay on the order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The Supreme Court granted two-week period to the Chandigarh Administration and Kler Wines and others to complete the ‘pleadings’, and directed the High Court to take up the matter for final disposal on the next day of the completion of ‘pleadings’.

The Chandigarh liquor vend tendering process for 2025-26 came under judicial scrutiny after a contractor alleged cartelisation and non-compliance with the Excise Policy. One of the petitions in the HC contended that the tendering results revealed that 87 out of 97 vends had been allocated to just two or three individuals operating under different firm names or through their relatives, associates, and employees.

Advertisement

Challenging the notice inviting tender dated March 13, M/s Kler Wines and another petitioner had argued that the entire process had been conducted in contravention of prescribed rules.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement