TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Bail plea of fraud accused rejected

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

Chandigarh, September 16

Advertisement

A local court has rejected the bail application of an accused arrested on the charge of defrauding a city resident through credit card.

The police had arrested the accused, Ashish, on July 6, 2021, in a case registered on a complaint of a city resident, Pawan Kumar. Pawan alleged that he received a phone call from a person on February 6, 2021, claiming to be a representative of SBI credit card. The caller told Pawan that a policy was active on his credit card and the charge for the same would be debited from his credit card.

The complainant said he did not take any policy. The caller took some details of the credit card, along with the OTP, to deactivate the policy. Later, a sum of Rs19,188 was deducted from the complainant’s credit card. During the course of investigation, the police arrested the accused, a resident of Delhi.

Advertisement

The prosecution opposed the bail plea of the accused stating that sufficient evidence was found against the accused from the investigation conducted so far. The investigation in the case was pending on several aspects. If the bail was granted to the accused, he might jump the bail and tamper with the evidence.

The counsel for the petitioner stated that Ashish was in custody since his arrest. Investigation had been completed and the challan had already been presented in the case. Co-accused Nikhil had already been discharged by the Trial Court.

After hearing the arguments, the court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement