TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Beant assassination case convict moves HC for premature release

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Chandigarh, December 13

Advertisement

More than 27 years after Punjab’s former CM Beant Singh was assassinated, a convict in the case today moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking pre-mature release. Taking up his petition, Justice Avneesh Jhingan issued a notice of motion to the Union Territory of Chandigarh. A notice was also issued to Burail Jail Superintendent, Patiala District Magistrate and the SSP.

Advertisement

Mere pawns

Referring to a HC order conforming life imprisonment and other short-term sentences awarded to the petitioner, Jindal added a Division Bench recorded the finding that Gurmeet Singh and co-accused Lakhwinder Singh and Shamsher Singh were merely pawns in the hands of Balwant Singh and Jagtar Singh Hawara. They were only giving logistic support for the assassination.

Justice Jhingan fixed February 20, 2023, as the next date of hearing on the petition filed by Gurmeet Singh through counsel Vijay K Jindal and Vipul Jindal. The Bench, during the preliminary hearing of the case, was told that the Gurmeet Singh was seeking the quashing of the impugned order dated October 31, whereby his plea for pre-mature release was declined.

Advertisement

This, Vijay Jindal contended, was violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution. Directions were also sought for issuance of an order, holding that the petitioner fulfilled all the requisite conditions for grant of premature release and was fully entitled to the same on usual terms and conditions in accordance with the policy applicable to the UT convicts after completion of 14-year actual sentence and 20-year total sentence.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement