TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

CBI court to pronounce judgment in 17-year-old cash-at-judge’s door case on March 29

Final arguments conclude after high court allows the prosecution to examine additional witnesses
The judge had previously ordered the police's CID to issue an interpol warrant for Patel's arrest. Representative image/File

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Alka Malik, Special Judge, CBI Court, Chandigarh, will pronounce the judgment in the 17-year-old alleged cash at judge's door case on March 29.

Advertisement

The final arguments on the additional evidences produced by the prosecution and the rebuttal by the defence counsel concluded on Thursday.

Advertisement

The prosecution had examined additional witnesses on the direction of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The prosecution had sought permission from the high court for summoning and re-examining 22 witnesses, asserting that their testimonies were vital.

However, the high court allowed re-examination of only six witnesses. Initially, the prosecution cited 84 witnesses in the case of which only 69 were examined.

Narendra Singh, public prosecutor, argued that the prosecution had proved the case beyond a shadow of doubt. However, Vishal Garg Narwana, counsel appearing on behalf of Justice Nirmal Yadav, argued that the CBI had falsely implicated her in the case. The CBI itself had earlier filed a closure report in the case.

Advertisement

The Chandigarh police had registered an FIR in the case on August 16, 2008, after a bag containing Rs 15 lakh was allegedly delivered to the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur of the Punjab and Haryana High Court by mistake.

Initially, the case was investigated by the local police; however, subsequently the matter was referred to the CBI on August 26, 2008 by the then Chandigarh administrator.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement