TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Contempt plea by school bus operators: High Court puts Chandigarh Adviser on notice

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Chandigarh, June 13

Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice to UT Adviser Dharam Pal to show cause why contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act be not initiated against him. The notice by Justice BS Walia came on a contempt petition filed by Chandigarh School Bus Operators Welfare Association through its president Manjit Singh Saini.

Advertisement

The petitioner, through counsel Ranjivan Singh and Kanika Toor, was among other things alleging non-compliance of the judgment passed by a Division Bench on February 10 on a petition filed by the association seeking various concessions for the Covid-19 period.

Ranjivan Singh contended that school buses operating for private schools in Chandigarh were completely off road since March 2020 following the Covid-19 outbreak. The school only reopened for physical teaching after two years from April.

It was added that the association had earlier approached the UT Administration on September 24, 2021, by way of memoranda seeking various concessions for the period by way of exemption in the motor vehicle tax and extension of the life span of buses for the period the vehicles were off the road. The UT Administration exempted motor vehicle tax for 2020, but a decision was not taken regarding exemption of the same from January 2021 till March 2022. Further, a call was not taken for granting extension in life span to all buses.

Advertisement

The association filed a petition, which was disposed of on February 10 following a statement made by the UT senior standing counsel that the claims were under active consideration of the Administration. The UT Adviser was also asked to decide the memoranda submitted by the association within two months.

However, the UT Adviser has not taken a final decision upon the concessions claimed within the timeframe stipulated by the High Court.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement