TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Flipkart told to refund Rs 29,890

Photo for representational purpose only. - File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission here has directed Flipkart International Pvt Ltd to pay compensation of Rs 10,000 to a city resident who received a dummy mobile instead of the actual phone. The commission also directed to refund Rs 29,890 along with interest at 9 per cent per annum to the resident, Sumit Syal, a resident of Panjab University.

Advertisement

In the complaint filed before the commission, he said he had ordered a mobile phone online through Flipkart and made a payment of Rs 29,890 on September 25, 2019. When he opened the parcel he was stunned to see a dummy mobile phone inside.

Advertisement

He took the photographs of the dummy phone and complained to Flipkart but the issue did not get resolve.

On the other hand, Flipkart and Ekart Logistics, appeared before the commission through their counsel and claimed that the complaint was not maintainable. Flipkart stated that it was e-commerce platform which acted as an intermediary to facilitate sale transactions between independent third party sellers and independent customers, so it or its operation entity could not be held liable. It falls in the definition of an “intermediary” under Section 2 (1) (w) of the information Technology Act, 2000.

After hearing the arguments the commission said the record reveals that the amount had not been refunded, nor the dummy phone was replaced. Hence, the opposite parties were directed to refund the amount.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Tags :
Consumer RightsDummy PhoneFlipkart
Show comments
Advertisement