Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Floor-wise sale of houses in Chandigarh: High Court reserves verdict

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Chandigarh, September 30

Advertisement

Nearly five years after the brick-by-brick demolition of the city’s glorious past with the raising of apartments from the debris of palatial houses came under judicial scanner, the Punjab and Haryana High Court today reserved its verdict in the matter.

Advertisement

The High Court Bench of Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa and Justice Vivek Puri had earlier scanned newspaper advertisements to find out whether floor-wise sale of dwelling units was contemplated. Finding no less than two dozen such advertisements in the newspaper’s Sunday edition, the Bench had not only rapped the Chandigarh Administration, but also directed the holding of the exercise under the UT Chief Architect’s supervision.

The Bench had observed that it thought of scanning the advertisements as the court was seized of the matter and discovered 24 advertisements in the Sunday edition “scouting for purchasers /investors for separate floors/independent floors”.

Reproducing the advertisements, the Bench added that it lent credence to the petitioner-Residents Welfare Association that independent floors were being sold under the garb of sale of a certain percentage share of a residential unit.

Advertisement

The UT Estate Office had, during the course of hearing, claimed that it did not issue no-objection certificates mentioning particular floors. “No such NOC mentioning floor on the basis of share of owner/co-owner was issued by the deponent-Assistant Estate Officer or any of his predecessors as per records,” the Estate Officer had asserted.

In an affidavit placed before the Bench, it was added that the only exception were the “ones which may have been issued on the basis of registered sale deeds executed while the Chandigarh Apartment Rules-2001 were in vogue”. — TNS

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement