TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC issues bailable warrants against customs officials for non-compliance

Direction by Bench comes in case where court on September 20 directed Commissioner of Customs to release seized goods without further objections
“The order issued by the Deputy Commissioner adjudication does not seem to be in compliance with the court orders," the Bench asserted. File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued bailable warrants for the Commissioner of Customs and the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, requiring their presence in the court on October 3. The directive follows the court’s inquiry into the Commissioner’s absence, to which the counsel for the Union of India had no satisfactory response.

Advertisement

The direction by the Bench of Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Justice Sanjay Vashisth came in a case where the court on September 20 directed the Commissioner of Customs to release the seized goods without further objections.

Advertisement

The authorised signatory Samir Arora was also instructed to appear before the authorities on September 25 but the goods remained unreleased and Arora was subsequently directed to provide a bond of more than Rs 4 crore for the value of the seized goods, along with a bank guarantee of over Rs 6 crore to cover differential duty and potential penalties pending adjudication.

“The order issued by the Deputy Commissioner adjudication does not seem to be in compliance with the court orders and it appears that the officer concerned has not even bothered to notice the directions of this Court,” the Bench asserted.

The matter was brought to the court’s notice after a petition was filed against the Union of Indian and other respondents by Cuthbert Winner LLP and another petitioner through advocate Hemant Bassi with counsel Ritesh Singh, Gurmandeep Singh Sullar and Aakash Gupta. The petitioners were seeking directions for quashing order of seizure dated May 4, 2023.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement