TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC stays order by Commission for Scheduled Castes

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

Chandigarh, July 31

Acting on a petition filed by the PGI, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has stayed further proceedings before the National Commission for Scheduled Castes in a selection matter.

The stay order by Justice Alka Sarin came after senior advocate Amit Jhanji, appearing for the institute, contended that a respondent in the present petition approached the High Court by filing a writ petition, ‘Professor Narendra Kumar versus PGI and another’.

Advertisement

Among other things, directions were sought against treating different departments and specialties as separate units for reserving posts. Taking up the petition in February, the Bench admitted the matter after observing that it required detailed consideration.

Jhanji added the same issues were raised by the respondent, along with the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes Employees Welfare Association, by approaching the respondent commission. The selection process was stayed by the commission vide order dated June 21.

Jhanji, referring to the Rules of Procedure of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes, submitted that the rules said no action would be taken on subjudice matters. Hence, subjudice matters were not to be referred to the commission as complaints. Before parting with the case, Justice Sarin also issued a notice of motion for November 18.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement