TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Man walks free in sodomy case

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

Chandigarh, October 26

Advertisement

Judge, Fast-Track Special Court, Swati Sehgal has acquitted a 50-year-old person, who was accused of sodomising a two-year-old boy, after the prosecution failed to prove the charges.

The police registered the case in 2019 on a complaint filed by a counsellor of the woman-child helpline, who alleged that a boy aged two was sexually assaulted by the accused. Finding a prima facie case, the court framed charges against him, but he pleaded not guilty and claimed a trial.

Rohit Mahajan, advocate for the accused, argued that he had been falsely implicated in the case. He argued that the complainant herself said in the complaint that she was submitting a complaint to the police only for the reason that mandatory reporting was required under the POCSO Act. He further argued that the child’s parents had not come forward to lodge a complaint against the accused.

Advertisement

Both parents were examined in the court as prosecution witnesses but they did not support the prosecution version. Apart from them, there was no other prosecution witness on the basis of whose testimony, the alleged offence could be proved to the hilt.

He argued that the mother of the child, in a statement recorded under Section164, CrPC, did not allege anything against the accused. Mahajan said even the medical examination report of the victim did not support the prosecution’s case. After hearing of the arguments, the court acquitted the accused of the charges.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement