TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Release former dean's pension, other benefits, CAT directs PGI

Says decision to withhold retiral benefits illegal, pay dues within 2 months
PGIMER. Representational image

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Central Administrative Tribunal’s Chandigarh bench has ordered PGIMER to release all pending retirement benefits, including regular pension, gratuity, commutation of pension and leave encashment, to former dean Dr Rakesh Sehgal within two months.

Advertisement

No pending proceedings against Dr Sehgal

Advertisement

The Central Administrative Tribunal ruled that PGIMER illegally withheld Dr Sehgal’s pension and retirement benefits, directing full payment within 2 months plus 6% interest

The court emphasised since no disciplinary/criminal cases were pending against the ex-dean, the institute had no legal basis to withhold his dues, quashing their GST-related justification as arbitrary

In its ruling, the tribunal noted that since no disciplinary or criminal proceedings were pending against Dr Sehgal at the time of retirement, PGIMER’s decision to withhold his benefits was “unsustainable in law”. The bench specifically quashed PGIMER’s May 3, 2023 order linking the release of benefits to GST deposit details, terming this condition “arbitrary and illegal”.

Advertisement

The tribunal further directed that Dr Sehgal be paid interest at 6 per cent per annum on all arrears, calculated from two months after his retirement until the actual payment date.

Dr  Sehgal, represented by counsel Karan Singla, had challenged PGIMER’s withholding of his retirement benefits. Singla argued successfully that in the absence of any pending proceedings against his client, the institute had no legal grounds to withhold the dues.

Tribunal member Suresh Kumar Batra, while pronouncing the order, emphasised that PGIMER must comply with the directions within the stipulated two-month period from receiving the order copy.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement