TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Right to Service Commission penalises 5 Chandigarh Estate Office officials

The UT Estate Office. File photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Chief Commissioner, Right to Service Commission, Chandigarh, Mahavir Singh, has imposed penalties on five officials of the UT Estate Office for their failure to provide service to the applicant within the stipulated time frame.

Advertisement

Paramjeet Singh (75) had submitted an application in the Estate Office four years ago seeking details of extension amount for his house in Sector 46-D to be deposited with the Estate Office. However, the designated officer failed to provide the service within the stipulated time limit.

Advertisement

As per the list of public services, ‘Calculation and Intimation of Pending Dues’ was required to be provided to the applicant within 35 working days from the date of submission of the application.

Gurbachan Singh, branch incharge-cum-designated officer, Estate Office, told the Chief Commissioner that the delay had occurred on the part of various officials.

The Chief Commissioner held Saroj Khillan, senior assistant/accountant (retired voluntarily), for a delay of 43 days and imposed a penalty of Rs 1,500 on her. He found Sonal Bujahi, an accountant, responsible for a 48-day delay and imposed a penalty of Rs 1,500 on her. Inderjit Singh, the then SDO (Buildings), was held responsible for a delay of 109 days and a penalty of Rs 3,000 was imposed on him. Similarly, a delay of 41 days was established on part of Rajbir Kaur, senior assistant/ accountant, and a penalty of Rs 1,500 was imposed on her. Anjana Sharma, clerk/record keeper, was held responsible for causing a delay of 46 days. She was penalised with Rs 1,000. A half of the penalty amount was ordered to be paid to the applicant, Paramjeet Singh.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement