TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Kashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

AAP seeks amendments to Fee Bill

LoP Atishi. FILE

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Wednesday proposed several amendments to the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, claiming the current draft favours private school managements over parents.

Advertisement

The party demanded tighter audits, greater parental representation on fee regulation committees and a simpler grievance redressal mechanism.

Advertisement

Addressing a press conference, Leader of Opposition Atishi accused the BJP-led Delhi government of deliberately delaying the bill to allow schools to collect unchecked, hiked fees.

“This bill was ready in April but was brought to the House only now, giving schools months to impose arbitrary hikes,” she said.

AAP outlined four key amendments. First, it proposed mandatory annual audits, with schools required to submit audited accounts to parents. Parents would then be given 15 days to review and raise objections before any fee decision is finalised.

Advertisement

Second, the party suggested expanding the fee committees to include 10 elected parents, as opposed to the five-member composition currently stated in the bill.

Third, it demanded a more accessible grievance system — arguing a single parent’s complaint should be enough to initiate action, instead of the current requirement of 15 per cent of parents to do so.

Lastly, AAP insisted that parents must retain the right to challenge fee committee decisions in court.

“At the time of voting, it will become clear whether BJP MLAs stand with parents or with private school profiteers,” Atishi said.

AAP Chief Sanjeev Jha described the bill as “a shield for the school mafia,” alleging it centralises power with the Education Minister and Director of Education, bypassing judicial scrutiny.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement