Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Delhi court dismisses defamation plea against AAP’s Saurabh Bhardwaj

BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan had alleged Bhardwaj of defamation by falsely claiming at a press conference that an FIR had been lodged against him
AAP leader Saurabh Bhardwaj. PTI File Photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

A Delhi court on Saturday dismissed a plea filed by a BJP leader seeking the prosecution of AAP leader Saurabh Bhardwaj for alleged defamatory remarks in September 2018.

Advertisement

Special Judge Vishal Gogne rejected the petition filed by BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan, challenging an earlier trial court order that had dismissed his complaint against Bhardwaj.

Advertisement

Chauhan had alleged Bhardwaj defamed him by falsely claiming at a press conference that an FIR had been lodged against him.

“The criminal revision petition is dismissed,” the judge said.

The complaint was initially filed before the Rouse Avenue court in December 2024.

Advertisement

However, a magisterial court had dismissed Chauhan’s plea on February 19, citing that the alleged offence occurred in September 2018, and the three-year limitation period for filing a defamation complaint had already lapsed.

The magistrate ruled that none of the reasons presented by Chauhan justified condoning the delay in filing the complaint.

“The complainant is not entitled to the condonation of delay in filing the present complaint. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed,” the court held.

Following this, Chauhan had appealed against the magisterial court’s order, which has now been rejected.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement