Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Delhi riots: Court orders framing of charges against Congress ex-councillor Ishrat, 12 others

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, January 20

Advertisement

A court here has ordered the framing of charges, including those related to attempt to murder and unlawful assembly, against former Congress councillor Ishrat Jahan, ‘United Against Hate’ founder Khalid Saifi and 11 others in a 2020 northeast Delhi riots case.

Advertisement

The court, however, discharged all 13 of offences of criminal conspiracy, abetment and common intention and charges under the Arms Act.

Assaulted police officers

It has come on record that on February 26, 2020, at about 12.15 pm, a riotous armed mob, including the accused persons, had assembled and refused to follow the directions of police to disperse and had thrown stones and assaulted police officers, obstructing them in performing their official duties, and also fired a gunshot at head constable Yograj. Delhi Court

Advertisement

In an order passed on Friday, Special Judge Amitabh Rawat said: “Prima facie there are grounds for presuming that accused persons have committed offences under the IPC Sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with a deadly weapon), 186 (obstructing public servant), 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant), 332 (voluntarily causing hurt to public servant) and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty).”

The judge also said that the accused were liable to face trial for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 149 (unlawful assembly) of the IPC.

“All accused persons are discharged for offences under IPC Sections 34 (common intention), 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 109 (abetment),” the court said, adding that they were also discharged of offences under the provisions of the Arms Act.

The court put the accused on trial, saying their role was “prima facie” established based on the contents of the chargesheet and statements of witnesses.

“It has come on record that on February 26, 2020, at about 12.15 pm, a riotous armed mob (unlawful assembly), including the accused persons, in the prosecution of their common object had assembled and refused to follow the directions of police to disperse and had thrown stones and assaulted police officers while obstructing them in performing their official duties and also fired a gunshot at head constable HC Yograj,” the court said.

According to the prosecution, the incident occurred at the Masjidwali Gali in the Khureji Khas area of northeast Delhi.

The court emphasised that at the stage of framing the charges, only “prima facie” case was to be considered and whether the case against the accused was beyond a reasonable doubt would be established after trial.

“Eyewitness and victim HC Yograj had specifically named all the 13 accused persons at the first available opportunity when he gave a statement to record the present FIR immediately after the incident,” the court said.

It said the police official had “categorically identified” all accused persons, who had formed an armed unlawful assembly and “on the instigation of Ishrat Jahan and Khalid Saifi”, pelted stones at the police, while one juvenile from the mob fired at the head constable. The court also noted the statements of three public witnesses and other police witnesses.

It noted the statement of a public witness, according to which: “Khalid and Ishrat were instigating the crowd and firing took place from the crowd. Despite police request, Khalid and Ishrat did not move and were bent on pushing the police and they were also abusing them.”

The Jagat Puri police station had filed chargesheets against Ishrat Jahan, Khalid Saifi, Vikram Pratap, Samir Ansari, Mohammed Salim, Sabu Ansari, Iqbal Ahmed, Anzaar, Mohammed Ilyas, Mohammed Bilal Saif, Salim Ahmed, Mohammed Yameen and Sharif Khan.

Advertisement
Tags :
Congress
Show comments
Advertisement