TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | Time CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
EntertainmentIPL 2025
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Advertisement

Parl breach case: HC to hear bail pleas of accused on May 7

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday scheduled May 7 to hear the bail pleas of two accused - Neelam Azad and Manoranjan D - in the 2023 Parliament security breach case. A Division Bench, led by Justice Subramonium Prasad and...
Delhi High Court. File
Advertisement

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday scheduled May 7 to hear the bail pleas of two accused - Neelam Azad and Manoranjan D - in the 2023 Parliament security breach case.

A Division Bench, led by Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, postponed the appeals after the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), representing the Delhi Police, requested an adjournment. The ASG was unavailable for the hearing, prompting the request for a week’s delay.

Advertisement

However, Neelam Azad’s counsel strongly opposed the adjournment, arguing that such delays in matters concerning personal liberty were harmful to the nation. The counsel criticised the state for what he described as delaying tactics.

In response to the adjournment request, the proxy counsel representing the ASG dismissed the objection with a remark not to “give a moral lecture.”

Neelam Azad’s counsel retorted and said: “This is not a moral lecture, it’s a legitimate concern. If the ASG is truly interested, he should be present himself. We often see requests from officials like the ASG, SG or the Attorney General being granted, yet our own requests are denied. This behaviour from the state in such matters is unacceptable. If the ASG is serious, please list the case tomorrow.”

Advertisement

Justice Prasad, after hearing the brief squabble between the two sides, adjourned the case till May 7.

Advertisement
Tags :
DelhiDelhi High CourtparliamentParliament security breach case
Show comments
Advertisement