TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

PIL in SC for probe into Covid ‘mismanagement’

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

New Delhi, August 12

Advertisement

A PIL has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking an inquiry into the alleged mismanagement of Covid-19 pandemic, saying it was essential to inquire into the “lapses”.

Accusing the Centre of failing to undertake timely and effective measures to check transmission of Covid-19, the PIL demanded an independent inquiry by a commission headed by former judges of the top court appointed under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952.

Filed by six persons, including some former bureaucrats through advocate Prashant Bhushan, the petition is likely to be taken up on Friday.

Advertisement

What the plea states

  • Filed by six persons, including some former bureaucrats through advocate Prashant Bhushan, the petition is likely to be taken up on Friday
  • The Centre’s response to the pandemic and its ‘deleterious impact’ on the lives and livelihoods of the citizens is a ‘definite matter of public importance and warrants appointment of a commission’ under Section 3 of the Act, it submitted

The Centre’s response to the pandemic and its “deleterious impact” on the lives and livelihoods of the citizens is a “definite matter of public importance and warrants appointment of a commission” under section 3 of the Act, it submitted.

The nationwide lockdown and the manner in which it was implemented has had a “devastating impact” on jobs, livelihood and the overall economy, the PIL alleged, terming it “arbitrary, irrational and without due consultation with experts or state governments”.

“In spite of being the harshest and most restrictive lockdown in the world, it has failed to arrest the spread of the disease,” the PIL submitted.

Referring to the “exodus” of migrant workers during the lockdown from cities to their hometowns, it alleged that the authorities failed to draw up a national plan and issue guidelines for providing relief to vulnerable sections under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. There was a delay in ensuring adequate supplies of PPE during the pandemic, it submitted.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement