TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
Sports
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | United StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
Don't Miss
Advertisement

SC junks plea of accused over framing of charges

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

New Delhi, May 25

Advertisement

The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition filed by four accused challenging the Delhi High Court’s order to frame charges against them during the anti-CAA/NRC protests at Jamia Millia Islamia in December 2019.

Advertisement

“We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and, hence, the special leave petition is dismissed,” a Bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice MM Sundresh said.

The Bench, however, clarified that the observations made in the impugned judgment of the high court would not be treated as observations on merits of the case as evidence was still to be recorded.

“The trial court will independently apply its mind on whether or not the provisions of the relevant sections in which the charges have been framed, stand proved and established,” the top court noted in its May 19 order.

Advertisement

Setting aside the trial court’s order to discharge the accused, the HC had in framed charges against Md Qasim, Mahmood Anwar, Shahzar Raza Khan, Umar Ahmad, Md Bilal Nadeem, Sharjeel Imam and Chanda Yadav under the IPC and Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement