Gaza ceasefire

The Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement, reached after months of intense negotiations, provides a much-needed pause in the bloodshed. Yet, it is riddled with uncertainties that overshadow the relief it brings. With over 15 months of conflict leaving Gaza devastated and tens of thousands dead, the ceasefire is a tentative step towards hope amidst unparalleled suffering. The deal’s phased approach is both its strength and its Achilles’ heel. In the initial six-week phase, hostages and detainees will be exchanged, humanitarian aid will flow and displaced Palestinians will attempt to reclaim their homes. However, the ambiguity in its terms risks igniting renewed conflict. The unresolved details, especially regarding subsequent phases, expose the fragile foundation of this agreement.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, grappling with domestic political fractures, faces immense pressure to deliver a durable solution without empowering Hamas. Simultaneously, Hamas must balance internal consolidation with an external show of strength, risking its grip on Gaza if the ceasefire falters. The mediating roles of Qatar, Egypt and the US have been pivotal, but sustaining peace demands more than diplomatic acrobatics.

For Gazans, the truce offers a chance to rebuild lives amidst ruins, but the path to reconstruction is marred by logistical and political hurdles. For Israel, the return of hostages is a bittersweet victory, tainted by the staggering cost of human lives and the persistent threat of Hamas. The global community must seize this moment to galvanise a roadmap for lasting peace, integrating humanitarian aid with strategic diplomacy. The coming weeks will test the resolve of all parties, requiring them to prioritise humanity over political gain. While the ceasefire is a step forward, its success depends on bridging deep-seated divides and committing to sustainable solutions.