Info Nuggets
Why Thinkers Matter: Émile Durkheim
Advertisement
The moral architect of modern society
“Man is not merely an animal, but a moral being.” — Émile Durkheim
In an era torn by revolution, war and industrial upheaval, Émile Durkheim emerged not simply as a scholar, but as a moral compass for a society in flux. Born in Épinal, France, in 1858 and raised within the modest bounds of a Jewish family, Durkheim was expected to follow in his father’s rabbinical footsteps. Instead, he became the founder of modern French sociology and a pioneer of the scientific study of society.
Durkheim’s path to intellectual greatness began in the elite halls of the École Normale Supérieure, where philosophical debates mingled with dreams of national reform. He rejected religious dogma early in life but never abandoned the search for moral order. Instead, he sought to replace theological guidance with social science — anchoring society’s cohesion in facts, structures and collective beliefs.
The architect of social solidarity
Durkheim’s first major work, The Division of Labour in Society (1893), challenged the notion that modernity meant disintegration. He argued that as societies evolved, they moved from “mechanical solidarity” — based on sameness and tradition — to “organic solidarity,” where social cohesion is maintained through interdependence in a complex division of labour. It was a revolutionary lens through which to view industrial society: not as broken, but as evolving.
Yet, Durkheim was no utopian. He warned of anomie — a condition of normlessness that arises when rapid change disrupts the moral fabric of society. He saw in the unchecked advance of capitalism and technology a danger: a society adrift, where individuals felt alienated and rootless.
When data met morality
In Suicide (1897), Durkheim turned his gaze to the individual. With clinical precision, he showed that even an act as deeply personal as suicide was shaped by social forces. His study revealed a sobering truth: people are more likely to take their own lives when they are not integrated into a strong social network. Suicide, Durkheim showed, was not just psychological — it was sociological.
This work shattered long-held beliefs and laid the foundation for sociology as a discipline rooted in empirical observation and analysis. He treated social facts — norms, values and institutions — as things, real forces shaping human behaviour.
A scholar in the storm
Durkheim’s scholarship wasn’t detached from the currents of history. The Dreyfus Affair — a national scandal fuelled by anti-Semitism — shook France and stirred Durkheim’s conscience. He defended Alfred Dreyfus, the wrongfully accused Jewish army officer, with conviction and his experience only deepened his understanding of how collective passions could fracture social order.
In response, Durkheim turned to education and religion, believing that both were crucial in shaping moral citizens. In his final major work, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912), he explored totemic systems in Aboriginal Australia — not to study the exotic, but to uncover the universal. Religion, he argued, was not simply about gods; it was society worshipping itself. Rituals and beliefs weren’t superstitions — they were vital acts that reinforced collective identity and solidarity.
Legacy of a lifelong reformer
The outbreak of World War I, the death of his only son on the battlefield and rising nationalism took a tragic toll on Durkheim. He died in 1917, worn down by grief and the weight of his nation’s suffering.
Yet his legacy endures. His methodical, deeply moral vision of sociology helped transform the discipline into a foundational field in the modern university. Through the work of disciples like Marcel Mauss and the later innovations of Claude Lévi-Strauss, Durkheim’s influence stretched into anthropology, law, education and beyond.
Durkheim didn’t merely study society — he sought to heal it. In a time not unlike our own, filled with social fragmentation and ethical uncertainty, his work remains both a mirror and a map.
Durkheim’s famous quote revisited
“Man is not merely an animal, but a moral being.”
For Durkheim, this wasn’t just philosophy — it was a mission. Sociology, to him, wasn’t about numbers; it was about values. It was a call to understand ourselves — and to remake the world we live in.
Advertisement
Advertisement