Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My Money
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

9 years on, HC revives hearing in suo motu case on Jat stir violence, calls for status report

The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier may have turned infructuous with the passage of time
The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier might have turned infructuous with the passage of time. Tribune file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Nearly a decade after taking suo motu cognizance of reports published in these columns on alleged lawlessness during the Jat agitation, the Punjab and Haryana High Court on Monday virtually revived the matter by calling for a fresh status report on developments over the past six to seven years.

Advertisement

The Bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu issued the direction after being informed that several issues raised earlier might have turned infructuous with the passage of time.

Advertisement

As the matter came up for resumed hearing, amicus curiae and senior advocate Anupam Gupta told the Bench that high court had in August 2018 narrowed down the entire gamut of the case to four parts. “Due to the efflux of time, a lot many issues and disputes may have become infructuous”.

The issues framed by the court then the included monitoring of probe under senior IPS Amitabh Dhillon into cases of violence; to decide whether CBI probe was required into alleged rape in Murthal; monitoring investigation by the premier investigating agency into Moonak canal breach case; and to decide on government’s move to withdraw some cases against the agitators.

The Bench had then also directed senior advocate Gupta to submit a complete summary of the issues for better understanding of the matter.

Advertisement

Taking a note of the submissions, the Bench asked the State counsel to “file synopsis of the present status of the developments that have taken place during the last six-seven years with regard to the issues”. The synopsis was directed to be vetted by amicus Gupta before its submission.

The high court – among other things – had then taken cognizance of alleged sexual assault on women in the fields of Murthal by 30-odd goons during the reservation agitation.

The Bench during the course of hearing was then told that Munak canal was breached during the stir, affecting water supply to Delhi. It was also told that as many as 2015 cases were registered police in 21 districts across the State after extensive violence broke, but there was an attempt by the government to withdraw some of the matters.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement