Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill ViewBenchmark
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Direct assault on rule of law: SC flags rise in digital arrest scams

Takes suo motu notice of Rs 1.05-cr fraud with Ambala elderly couple
Photo for representational purpose only. PTI file

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

Expressing serious concern over rising online frauds, particularly digital arrests, to dupe people by fabricating judicial orders, the Supreme Court on Friday asked the Centre and the CBI to spell out their stand on dealing with the menace.

Advertisement

A Bench led by Justice Surya Kant took suo motu cognisance of a shocking case of digital arrest of an elderly couple in Ambala on the basis of forged orders of the top court and probe agencies by fraudsters to extort more than Rs 1.05 crore. It also asked Haryana Government and Superintendent of Police, Cybercrime, Ambala, to file their response.

Advertisement

“The forgery of documents and the brazen criminal misuse of the name, seal and judicial authority of this court or a high court is a matter of grave concern. The fabrication of judicial orders bearing forged signatures of judges strikes at the very foundation of public trust in the judicial system, besides the rule of law, the Bench said.

“Such acts constitute a direct assault on the dignity and majesty of this institution. Therefore, such grave criminal acts cannot be treated as ordinary or routine offences of cheating or cybercrime,” said the Bench, which also included Justice Joymalya Bagchi.

“Ordinarily we would have directed the state police to expedite the investigation and take it to a logical conclusion. We are, however, aghast at the fact that the fraudsters have fabricated judicial orders in the name of the Supreme Court and various other documents,” it added.

Advertisement

Noting that the instant case was not a solitary instance and that such incidents had been reported many times in responsible media reports in the past in different parts of the country, the Bench said, “We are, therefore, of the prima facie view that a stern action on a pan-India basis with coordinated efforts between the Centre and state police are required to unearth the full extent of this criminal enterprise involving forgery of judicial documents, cyber extortion and cyber arrest of the innocent people, especially senior citizens.”

In regard to the manner in which similar crimes were being committed, the top court requested Attorney General R Venkataramani to assist it in the matter.

As two FIRs have been lodged with the cybercrime department at Ambala under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Bench directed the Ambala SP (Cybercrime) to file a status report on the investigation done so far and posted the matter for further hearing on October 27.

The top court registered a suo motu petition after a 73-year-old woman wrote to CJI BR Gavai on September 21 informing she and her husband were defrauded by using false and forged judicial orders.

She alleged that fraudsters produced a forged court order with stamp and seal for arrest and surveillance of the couple between September 3 and 16, 2025 to force them to part with over Rs.1.05 crore through multiple bank transactions.

The Ambala woman said the court orders, ED freeze order and arrest order under PMLA and a surveillance order were shown to her and her husband through multiple audio and video calls by people impersonating as CBI, ED and judicial officers to “detain them digitally”.

Advertisement
Tags :
#DigitalArrests#ElderlyFraud#ExtortionSchemeCBIInvestigationcybercrimeCybersecurityforgeddocumentsJudicialOrdersonlinefraudSupremeCourt
Show comments
Advertisement