TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

HC pulls up state for denying compassionate benefits

Imposes Rs 75,000 costs each in 3 cases
The Punjab and Haryana High Court. Tribune photo

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has rapped Haryana for its “apathy and insensitivity” in denying compassionate benefits under a 2019 scheme, before imposing Rs 75,000 costs each in three similar cases.

Advertisement

In one of the pleas, a widow was seeking directions to the State and other respondents to release compassionate financial assistance under the Haryana Civil Services (Compassionate Financial Assistance or Appointment) Rules, 2019, following her JBT husband's untimely death.

Advertisement

The Bench was told that the rules were notified on August 2, 2019, for “granting compassionate financial assistance or appointment to the family of a government employee who dies or disappears while in service”. A provision stipulates that a “family member” was eligible for compassionate appointment if the deceased had completed five years of regular service and had not attained the age of 52 years at the time of death.

Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya observed that the admissible benefits were withheld on the basis of advice from the Chief Secretary not to release the amount until a final decision was taken regarding her husband’s appointment. The State counsel told the court that appointments of JBTs pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2009 were disputed “on the ground that some of the selected candidates had cleared HTET examination by fraud”.

Justice Dahiya asserted that the petitioner’s husband, irrespective of the allegation, was appointed as a JBT and served the department for about nine years. No action of any kind was taken against him during the tenure.

Advertisement

“Despite these facts being in the knowledge of the respondents, the due amount of compassionate assistance and ex-gratia grant was not released to the petitioner. It has been kept pending without offering any plausible explanation, which shows their apathy and insensitivity to the plight of a person who is entitled to the claimed benefits under the 2019 Rules,” the court stated.

Allowing a bunch of pleas, the Bench directed the State to release the assistance and grant, along with interest at 9% per annum from the date the amount became due till actual payment. “The directions shall be carried out within a period of four weeks of receiving a certified copy of the judgment,” the Bench ordered.

Advertisement
Tags :
#CompassionateAppointment#CompassionateBenefits#JBTTeacher#WidowReliefcourtorderFinancialAssistanceGovernmentEmployeeBenefitsHaryanaGovernmentHaryanaHighCourtlegalcase
Show comments
Advertisement